Search for: "MATTER OF T A G"
Results 281 - 300
of 5,918
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2012, 5:01 pm
In the light of the foregoing the only novelty-related issue for the subject-matter of claim 1 is whether the content of 11, i.e. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 3:01 pm
(g), note 77, at page 987. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 3:02 pm
It follows that if the subject-matter of the claim comprises ranges of values or specific values, these ranges or values have to be comprised directly and unambiguously in the previous application on which the priority claim is based (see T 136/01, T 788/01). [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 3:01 pm
As a matter of fact, thi [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 11:21 am
Darrin T. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 6:49 pm
[I don't want to hear anything about the title of this post. [read post]
21 Jan 2012, 11:01 am
” (see G 02/08 [7; headnote 3]). [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 1:51 am
The crux of the matter is adequately summarised in the following passage of the Guidelines for Examination in the EPO (November 2016) [in the following: "Guidelines"], G-IV, 7.5.1:"The nature of the Internet can make it difficult to establish the actual date on which information was made available to the public: for instance, not all web pages mention when they were published. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 5:01 pm
As a matter of fact, the data sheet for the polystyrene PS 158 K does not contain any indication regarding the molecular weight of the polymer sold by BASF. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 5:01 pm
As can be derived from the Enlarged Board of Appeal’s argumentation G 10/91 [18], the term “fresh ground of opposition” means a ground which is relied upon for the first time in appeal proceedings (T 986/93 [2.3]). [read post]
11 May 2021, 8:54 am
With a further letter dated 10 November 2020, the patent proprietor clarified its requests and submitted sets of claims G-J and G'-I'.XIII. [read post]
24 Mar 2012, 12:01 pm
” [7] None of the circumstances for the avoidance of the classical “problem and solution approach” referred to in decision T 465/92 is present in the case at hand, i.e. neither can the claimed subject-matter be considered as breaking new ground, since document D4 describes a G-protein coupled receptor specifically located in taste cells nor is there a large number of equally close prior art documents […]. [8] Thus, having considered the rationale… [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 6:21 pm
In the present case, the ED's decision is totally silent on these issues, so that the rejection under A 56 is not reasoned, contrary to the requirements of R 111(2). [4]For the further prosecution of the application attention should be paid to G 1/03 [2.5] which stipulates that "if a claim comprises non-working embodiments, this may have different consequences, depending on the circumstances. [...] [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 5:01 pm
In fact, the highest AUL-value in the examples of the contested patent is 30.5 g/g […]. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 3:01 pm
Whereas method claims are absolutely forbidden in order to leave the physician free to act unfettered, product claims are allowable provided their subject-matter is new and inventive (G 2/08 [5.7]). [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 4:02 pm
T 279/93 [5.4]). [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 4:02 pm
T 279/93 [5.4]). [read post]
1 May 2013, 5:01 pm
This was clear from decisions T 305/08 and T 452/05. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 5:36 am
Because “[t]he invention is not the language of the [claim] but the subject matter thereby defined,” Teva’s argument must fail. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 12:25 pm
We have successfully handled tens of thousands of immigration matters over the past 27 years. [read post]
