Search for: "MERRELL v. U.S." Results 281 - 300 of 382
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Sep 2014, 9:00 am by Maureen Johnston
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals regarding important expert testimony requires the appellate court to order a new trial, regardless of whether there was actually any substantive error in the expert testimony heard or not heard by the jury. [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 12:34 pm by Schachtman
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, 509 U.S. 579 (1993), and which did involve any Rule 702 challenge to the use of a flawed statistical analysis. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 5:00 am
According to the rules outlined in the most famous Supreme Court case on this topic (Daubert v. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 7:22 am by Schachtman
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 593 (1993) (specifying the “the known or potential rate of error” as one of several factors in assessing the scientific reliability or validity of proffered expert witness’s opinion) Kumho Tire Co. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2007, 4:08 am
Merrell Dow Pharm., Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993), which requires that district courts act as “gatekeepers” concerning the admissibility of evidence - does not apply at the class certification stage. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 9:03 am
Mercury Marine, 537 U.S. 51, 64 (2002) (quoting English); American Insurance Ass'n v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 8:22 am by admin
Merrell Dow Pharm., Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993). [6] General Electric Co. v. [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 4:14 am
Merrell Dow Pharm., Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993), which requires that district courts act as "gatekeepers" concerning the admissibility of evidence - does not apply at the class certification stage. [read post]