Search for: "Mark Burger "
Results 281 - 300
of 642
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 May 2014, 10:48 pm
Tim Bukher takes apart the widely-reported HEART ATTACK SANDWICH and TRIPLE BYPASS BURGER decision over at his blog. [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:44 am
If civil rights lawyers begin invoking the principles elaborated and consolidated by popular spokesmen like Lyndon Johnson and Hubert Humphrey and Richard Nixon and Everett Dirksen, and not only depend on the opinions of the Warren and Burger Courts, these justices may begin to embrace an originalist framework that provides this great legacy with a solid foundation in popular sovereignty.Supreme Court litigators have one overriding objective: getting five votes on their side. [read post]
20 May 2014, 6:08 am
This fixation on the Warren and Burger Courts is a symptom of a larger dis-ease: Whether you are a judge or an advocate, a bureaucrat or a legislative counsel, the place to begin your study of the modern Constitution is with the great decisions of a long line of Justices from Holmes to Scalia. [read post]
13 May 2014, 7:59 am
Coli Outbreak New York Times, Mark Bittman, June 8. 2011 – Bill Marler: A Personal Injury Attorney and More The Xemplar, Nicole Black, June 1. 2011 – Good Food Hero: Bill Marler, Food Safety Attorney Good Food World, Gail Nickel-Kailing, May 23. 2011- Poisoned: The True Story of the Deadly E. coli Outbreak that Changed the Way Americans Eat. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 8:22 am
Law professors mark exams in mysterious ways. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 6:00 am
§ 1125, dilution by blurring requires an association between the famous mark and the junior mark that impairs the distinctiveness of the famous mark, and dilution by tarnishment must harm the reputation of the famous mark. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 11:47 am
Trademark law prevents the use of others’ trademarks when that is likely to cause confusion about who is using the trademark; for instance, if I open up a restaurant called “Burger King,” without Burger King’s approval, I will likely be infringing on its trademark, because many consumers will be confused into thinking that this is actually a restaurant owned or franchised by Burger King. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 9:32 am
The teams were amateur, but the contest marked a significant date in baseball’s beginnings. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 4:36 am
Harvard Law Review Symposium 2014: Freedom of the PressIntroduction: Mark Tushnet, Reflections on the First Amendment and the Information Economy Symposium papers provide an opportunity to speculate about 1A issues in modern information economy, which is different from the info economy in 1963. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 4:03 am
You may say, Well, sure, that may be true if you're in a white-collar professional job, but what about if you're flipping burgers at the greasy spoon? [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 6:12 am
Circuit yesterday, which is significant because it marks the first time in decades that the court hasn’t had any judicial vacancies. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 10:01 pm
Burger King, with 500 outlets in the U.K., dropped Silvercrest as its beef supplier. [read post]
29 Dec 2013, 12:31 pm
Which leads me to the point: Mark’s post. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 10:07 am
” Mark O’Mara didn’t ignore this and noted that “common sense will work against my client. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 4:07 am
In re The Works Gourmet Burger Bistro, Inc., Serial No. 76704958 (November 29, 2013) [not precedential]. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 3:48 pm
I know of few jobs these days, other than flipping burgers, that doesn't involve using the internet in one way or another. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 8:00 am
Each combo features a burger or chicken nuggets, two tacos, seasoned curly fries, and a 20-oz. beverage. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 1:18 pm
Here, the presence of house marks was essentially dispositive. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 8:00 am
Non-party Steak n Shake Operations, Inc., Steak n Shake Enterprises' parent company, has continuously operated Steak n Shake restaurants specializing in burgers and milkshakes since 1934. [read post]
27 Aug 2013, 5:28 am
” This is one way to define judicial activism, but if this is the definition Justice Ginsburg wants to use, her accusation falls wide of the mark. [read post]
