Search for: "Mark A. Lemley"
Results 281 - 300
of 1,104
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Mar 2018, 8:50 pm
This should be an excellent conference, with keynote speaker Richard Posner and excellent participants including Mark Lemley, Darren Bush, Anthony Kreis, Eric Segall, Caprice Roberts, Spencer Waller, Nancy Leong, and prawfsblawgers me and Carissa Hessick. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 9:51 pm
The bonus is an inside view of the Silicon Valley culture, including as Mark Lemley put it to me, "perhaps the most Silicon Valley fact ever:" Project Chauffeur employees began calling in sick so that they could interview with other firms or with venture capitalists. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 3:04 am
This, including Biden's call on the FTC to take action, follows what Mark Lemley and I recommended in our 2021 Day One Report. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 5:05 am
However, it raises questions about the purpose of trademark law, as noted by law professor Mark Lemley during his NPR interview. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 9:04 am
from Mark Lemley, David Schwartz, and Christopher Yoo: The Northwestern, Penn and Stanford Law Schools are pleased to announce a Call for Papers for the Sixth Junior Faculty Forum on Law and STEM, which will be held at Stanford on October 27-28, 2023. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 11:36 am
In 2021 Mark Lemley and I wrote a Day One Report... [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 9:32 pm
Professor Mark Lemley of Stanford Law School; Matthew Lynde of Cornerstone Research; and Joshua Walker, Executive Director of the IP Litigation Clearinghouse, will provide a one-hour audio briefing on the Stanford IP Litigation Clearinghouse, a new database on U.S. [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 12:38 pm
Mark Lemley, Mark McKenna, James Weinstein, and I also filed an amicus brief pointing out that, even if there had been a party (there wasn't), it still wouldn't have infringed ASU's trademarks. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 8:59 am
, which included:"It's rare that you've got a major breakthrough that wasn't developed by multiple people at about the same time," said Mark Lemley, professor of intellectual property at Stanford Law School.Or, for that matter, on the same day. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 5:14 pm
Mark A. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 1:48 am
New §43(c)(1) requires "use of a mark or trade name in commerce" likely to dilute "the famous mark," thus apparently imposing a "use as a source-identifier" requirement. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 6:13 pm
As a result, it is unsurprising that behavioral norms similar to those in the scientific fields have yet to emerge.As to inadequate review of law review articles, Mark Lemley, in the Stanford Law Review, proclaimed Gary Boone the inventor of the integrated circuit.From Did Mark Lemley name Gary Boone as the inventor of the integrated circuit? [read post]
1 Jun 2007, 8:45 pm
On the theme of patent law credentials (see for example previous IPBiz post: Mark Lemley is not a patent attorney), Greedy IP has a post of a letter concerning the credentials of Margaret J.A. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 12:50 pm
Lemley Stanford Law School Arti K. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 10:49 am
Mark Lemley, David Post, and Dave Levine have an excellent article in the Stanford Law Review Online, Don’t Break the Internet. [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 12:21 am
Lemley & Kimberly A. [read post]
28 Feb 2016, 7:07 pm
Lemley, Mark A. and Feldman, Robin, Patent Licensing, Technology Transfer, & Innovation (February 26, 2016). [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 12:24 pm
" One gets a flavor of things planned from footnote 5 of a Senate report which includes Mark Lemley and Jaffe and Lerner, among others. [read post]
4 Sep 2006, 8:06 am
In Spillovers, Mark Lemley and I develop an economic theory of IP (and many other areas of law really) that is a step in the direction of understanding how distribution is not simply a secondary fairness concern within intellectual property but instead is a primary efficiency concern, and it is more than simply getting more consumption from a nonrival good. [read post]
23 Mar 2019, 7:46 pm
In a highly-cited 2001 article, Rational Ignorance at the Patent Office, Mark Lemley argued that it doesn’t make sense to invest more resources in examination: since only a minority of patents are licensed or litigated, thorough scrutiny should be saved for only those patents that turn out to be valuable. [read post]
