Search for: "Marks v. Cross"
Results 281 - 300
of 2,842
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jan 2008, 8:17 am
(Editor’s Note I: As the hit counter on the right hand side of this blog indicates, our Harvard Law School Corporate Governance Blog crossed the 1-million-hits mark this past weekend. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 2:29 pm
In better light, Whitley noticed other marks on his face. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 1:35 pm
See Medicines Co. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 1:15 am
* Hospira v Genentech Mark 1, the AppealThe dispute between Hospira and Genentech in the UK courts is getting a little confusing. [read post]
In Genesis Healthcare v. Symczyk, Supreme Court ducks actual mootness issue raised by Rule 68 offers
26 Apr 2013, 2:03 pm
(internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 4:03 am
And yes, Eleonora will be in.* Cross-Border Enforcement of Intellectual Property: at last, the book reviewEarlier this month, Jeremy posted an announcement concerning the publication of The Research Handbook on Cross-Border Enforcement of Intellectual Property. [read post]
23 Aug 2014, 6:41 pm
The court in State v. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 12:23 pm
Bayer also cross-appealed the rejection of its 6bis claim. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 9:05 am
Introduced by Will Baude, Driver guest-posted at the Volokh Conspiracy in September on why the Supreme Court has made a difference; the high-water mark and retreat of student speech rights; corporal punishment; Plyler v. [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 11:18 am
In Cerveceria Modelo, S.A. de C.V. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 11:05 am
See Patterson v. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 2:27 am
The Seattle Times yesterday reported on the July 11 oral argument in the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment in Experience Hendrix, LLC, v. [read post]
15 May 2017, 4:41 am
’” Constitution Daily marks the May 14 anniversary of the court’s decision in Frontiero v. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 2:15 am
The consensus is that no “presumption [of validity] arises from a pending application to register a mark,” Aspen Grove, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 12:00 pm
Firstly, a look at the German Higher Regional Court Düsseldorf appeal decision in MERCK SHARP & DOHME V. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 3:00 am
No, said the court, there was no passing off, but yes, there had been trade mark infringement. [read post]
19 May 2020, 3:27 am
Co., Ltd. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 12:23 am
He has gone to some lengths to undermine IP rights belonging to Dame Vivienne Westwood OBE [see Westwood v Knight [2010] EWPCC 16, noted by the IPKat here, and Westwood v Knight [2011] EWPCC 11, noted by the IPKat here, as well as Katpost here] and this time his victim of choice was Scottish designer Alison Hendrick.In this instance Geoffrey Hobbs QC was hearing an appeal against decisions to reject Knight's oppositions to Hendrick's applications to register a skull… [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 3:39 am
Bryant, Jr. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 7:25 am
In yesterday’s case (Culos v. [read post]
