Search for: "Marks v. USA"
Results 281 - 300
of 1,911
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Dec 2021, 8:33 am
Cir. 2018) (quotation marks omitted). [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 5:35 pm
Salon FAD v. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 3:11 am
October 21, 2020 - 11 AM: In re Hydro-Gear Limited Partnership, Serial No. 87641657 [Refusal to register ZT-1800 for "Land vehicle parts, namely, transaxles" on the ground that the proposed mark will be perceived merely as a model designation and therefore it fails to function as a trademark].October 22, 2020 - 2 PM: Combe Incorporated v. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 6:02 pm
Anthony List v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:36 am
| 3-D Lego trade mark | Garcia v Google | B+ subgroup | EU trade mark reform and counterfeits in transit | French v Battistelli | US v Canada over piracy | UK Supreme Court in Starbucks | BASCA v The Secretary of State for Business | Patent litigation, music, politics | Product placement in Japan.Never too late 50 [week ending on Sunday 7 June] - Swiss claims | Italian-sounding trade marks for… [read post]
7 May 2019, 2:58 am
See Tao Licensing, LLC v. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 2:59 am
v. [read post]
13 Feb 2007, 1:20 pm
In this post at the Supreme Court Times Blog, Ross Runkel reports that Altadis USA, Inc v. [read post]
1 Jan 2010, 6:07 pm
Rocky Brands, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 1:22 am
Compass Group USA, Inc. (10th Cir., October 23, 2017) (affirming dismissal of Title VII discrimination case because he filed after the end of the 90-day filing period and provided an incorrect address to the EEOC)ERISA *Stephens v. [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 2:53 am
In this, the 17 November Senate hearing for Jack Dorsey and Mark Zuckerberg’s subpoenas was instructive. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 11:09 am
This morning the Court released a per curiam opinion in Friedrichs v. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 6:14 am
First up is a pair of consolidated cases — Nestlé USA v. [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 4:31 am
In Philip Morris USA v. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 10:09 pm
On July 4th, 2013, the Max Planck Institute Luxembourg for International, European and Regulatory Procedural Law invited experts from the USA and Europe to a colloquium to discuss the consequences of the US Supreme Court’s decision in the proceedings Kiobel v. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 4:38 am
Amy Howe and Mark Walsh cover the event for this blog. [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 2:57 am
AWP USA Inc. v. [read post]
9 Sep 2021, 3:27 am
Realty, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 2:27 am
The case is Rolex Watch USA, Inc. v. [read post]
3 May 2021, 6:29 am
Lengthy use by the Unified Buddhist Church of Vietnam of its unregistered marks was not enough, by itself, to raise a triable issue as to the marks’ protectability. [read post]
