Search for: "Marvelle v. State" Results 281 - 300 of 481
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Aug 2013, 10:25 pm by Matthew David Brozik
” The August 20, 2013, decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in Unclaimed Property Recovery Service, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2013, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
Guimond, 2013 QCCS 3730 case on copyright and moral rights infringement http://t.co/4l9EeTeOnE -> Link to Marvel Characters, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 9:26 am by Sheldon Toplitt
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)In the 57-page opinion this week in Marvel Entertainment, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 10:19 am by WSLL
OLIVER, d/b/a CRAZY TONY’S RESTAURANT v. [read post]
19 Jul 2013, 1:33 pm by James Yang
In Kimble v Marvel, Kimble approached Marvel with a spider man toy where kids could spread a web of string upon mimicking spider-man’s classic hand motion. [read post]
19 Jul 2013, 7:25 am
  As a result, the District Court was obliged to apply the Supreme Court’s 1964 ruling in Brulotte v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 12:32 pm by Tom Goldstein and Dan Stein
Roberts would also represent a number of states in the Microsoft antitrust case, United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 9:42 am by Michael M. O'Hear
The Supreme Court offered its latest foray into the ACCA quagmire yesterday in Descamps v. [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 7:06 am by Barry Sookman
CJEU reasoning in Usedsoft v Oracle http://bit.ly/13zsrq5 Monsanto Wins Again in Federal Circuit: Organic Farmers Have No Standing to Challenge Patent http://bit.ly/13zsfqL A majority of Americans find government&rsqu [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 2:21 pm by Cicely Wilson
The case was remanded for further proceedings.Read More: Appeals court rules Oklahoma license plate suit has meritUnited States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 2:30 am by David Oscar Markus
Shaygan, 676 F.3d 1237, 1238 (11th Cir. 2012) (Pryor, J., respecting the denial of rehearing en banc) (quoting United States v. [read post]
15 May 2013, 5:15 am by Steve McConnell
 But today we will conduct a mortality and morbidity meeting on the case of Marcum v. [read post]