Search for: "Massey Coal" Results 281 - 300 of 415
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Mar 2009, 10:00 pm
Massey Coal Company, Inc., et al. (08-22) - duty of elected judge to disqualify from case in which a major campaign donor has an interest Arthur Andersen LLP, et al. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 5:46 am by Joe Palazzolo
WSJ Big Branch mine: A former Massey Energy Co. official at a West Virginia coal mine where a 2010 explosion killed 29 workers pleaded guilty Thursday to impeding federal regulators. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 7:19 am by Ted Allen
 Section 1503, which was inspired in part by an April 2010 accident at a Massey Energy coal mine that killed 29 miners, requires mining companies to make quarterly and annual disclosure of mine safety violations, safety-related orders and penalties issued by federal mining regulators, and the number of mining fatalities. [read post]
1 Mar 2009, 8:37 am
Massey Coal Company, Inc., et al. (08-22) - Judge's campaign donations March 4 Abuelhawa v. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 3:00 pm
Massey Coal, on whether the Constitution requires an elected state judge to step aside from deciding a case involving the financial interests of a major campaign donor. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 6:17 am by Wolfe Law Firm
The Massey Energy Company, which owns the mine, was cited for 515 violations of safety in 2009 and another 124 already in 2010 prior to the explosion. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 5:32 pm by Lawrence Solum
Massey Coal Co.), these conflicting currents and others will force the practice to grow both in its pervasiveness and in its propensity to debase our commitment to actual justice and the appearance of justice. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 7:02 am by Rick Hasen
Massey Coal Co. addresses the problem by finding a due process violation when a contribution or donation is likely to have a “significant and disproportionate influence” on the judge’s election. [read post]
24 May 2010, 5:12 am by Andrew Perlman
Massey Coal Co., as well as ancillary federal developments, including renewed congressional interest in judicial disqualification. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 1:56 pm by Tuan Samahon
Massey Coal Company was a defendant because Blankenship was the company’s chairman, CEO, and president. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 7:00 am
Massey is back in the news as well: yesterday, the West Virginia Supreme Court ruled in coal company Massey’s favor, following a SCOTUS opinion holding that one of that court’s judges should have recused himself from the case because Massey’s CEO had made large donations to his re-election campaign. [read post]