Search for: "Matter of Fisher v Fisher"
Results 281 - 300
of 831
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2016, 12:48 pm
(Last Thursday, he read at length from his dissent in Fisher v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 6:09 am
State v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 1:21 pm
The second installment of Fisher v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 6:27 am
More importantly, the Court’s agonizingly narrow decision today in Fisher v. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 6:10 pm
Today’s decision in Fisher v. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 1:42 pm
But barring a surprise Trump win in the presidential election (which I would find even more distressing than the Court’s decision), few if any Court-watchers expect any significant restraint on racial preferences to come from the Justices after this decision, Fisher v. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 9:53 am
It’s hard to view today’s ruling in the second Fisher v. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 8:22 am
In this week’s case (Mohamud v. [read post]
13 May 2016, 1:56 pm
Cieszyski v. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 6:07 pm
Supreme Court’s second grant of cert in Fisher v University of Texas at Austin (Dkt No 14-981) were posted prior to the death of Justice Antonin Scalia. [read post]
24 Apr 2016, 9:39 am
This is evident in Justice Kennedy’s ongoing critique in the still-pending litigation following Fisher v. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 3:03 pm
In the Lipitor MDL for diabetes litigation, Judge Gergel generally used sharp analyses to cut through the rancid fat of litigation claims, to get to the heart of the matter. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 7:48 am
Commentary on Zubik v. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 9:01 pm
But last week the Ninth Circuit decided a case that shows how tricky government consideration of race can be, and how lower court judges sometimes make missteps in this complex area.The case is Mitchell v. [read post]
28 Feb 2016, 8:20 am
PCR, Inc., 754 So. 2d 683 (Fla. 2000) and Fisher v. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 9:03 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 9:03 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 5:02 pm
The worst possibility is that the appellate court might decline to exercise its discretionary jurisdiction to reverse in the interest of justice on an issue that might have merited reversal if the error had been preserved for review as a matter of law. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 5:02 pm
The worst possibility is that the appellate court might decline to exercise its discretionary jurisdiction to reverse in the interest of justice on an issue that might have merited reversal if the error had been preserved for review as a matter of law. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 6:59 am
.: Question 1: As a matter of Iowa law, does the doctrine of implied immunity of drainage districts as applied in cases such as Fisher v. [read post]
