Search for: "Matter of Personal Restraint of Long"
Results 281 - 300
of 1,059
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Sep 2008, 7:24 pm
But there are other times we can hardly avoid revealing hints about sensitive personal matters in public - when, for example, we enter a psychiatrist's office or other medical facility from a public street, pause to write down the time and location of an Alcoholics Anonymous meeting announced on a kiosk, or go for job interviews in hopes of changing our career path (and under the assumption that are current employers aren't at all likely to be nearby). [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 10:05 am
” Prior Restraint There is a presumption against prior restraints; if punishment or remedies against a speaker are permitted at all, the law generally allows such remedies only after he has spoken. [read post]
15 May 2013, 5:53 am
Pursuant to the so-called "third-party doctrine," when a person voluntarily turns over information to third parties or allows those third parties to collect information about his or her activities, that person has no expectation of privacy in that information protected by the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
14 May 2015, 7:04 pm
Person A remains guilty since there is no mechanism for retroactive consent, but now Person B is also guilty because Person A has not expressed prior positive agreement for this particular escalation. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 1:07 pm
These reasons include: the claimed matter is functional, meaning it affects the cost or quality of the product or service; the claimed matter is merely descriptive, meaning that consumers don’t understand that it indicates source and instead think that it just describes some characteristic of the product; the claimed matter is deceptively misdescriptive, which is like descriptiveness except not true; the claimed matter is deceptive; the claimed… [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 9:58 am
This would implicate Twitter's rights under the 1st Amendment because it would be both a content-based restriction of speech and a prior restraint on speech. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 5:07 am
The Court in Terry was very clear on the standard: The touchstone of a seizure is the restraint of an individual’s personal liberty “in some way. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 11:25 am
If anything, it’s a little long. [read post]
27 Aug 2008, 12:20 pm
But it means you can't do anything to stop the publication of "false and defamatory" statements until you've filed a complaint, taken the case to trial and won . . . which could be a long, long time. . . . well after the statements have done their damage.The court of appeals reached essentially the same conclusions with regard to the injunction's prohibiting the publication of "confidential personal information" online:A prohibition… [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 4:00 am
For example, although homeless people were successful in their Charter claim in Victoria (City) v Adams, this judicial bias is evident even in that case – the first to consider the relevance of international human rights law, including concerns and recommendations from the CESCR, to section 7 of the Charter.284 The BC Court of Appeal in Adams upheld the trial judge’s decision that the City of Victoria was violating homeless persons’ constitutional rights to life, liberty… [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 10:20 am
Still important, however, will be for how long the person was detained and the practicability of presenting them to the magistrates’ court. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 2:30 am
Restrictive covenants can be difficult to enforce and will only be enforceable so long as they seek to protect an employer’s legitimate economic interests because the courts view them as being a restraint of trade. [read post]
11 Dec 2010, 6:29 am
Insurances and beneficiaries on assets will be maintained, and commonly, restraints on assets will be imposed to prevent a sudden transfer or spending of money. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 12:14 pm
"Justice Kennedy is a different matter entirely. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 10:47 am
They concern personal injury and damage to property. [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 7:49 am
Rector had raged that he had no further use for Verolin and her “bastard white son” and that he intended to exclude her from his will because of her personal choice. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 3:45 am
The newest Culture Secretary Michelle Donelan appeared to endorse that when announcing the abandonment of ‘legal but harmful to adults’: "However admirable the goal, I do not believe that it is morally right to censor speech online that is legal to say in person. [read post]
25 May 2023, 4:30 am
Not surprisingly, I think this lack of transparency is a bigger problem than he does but that difference does not really matter. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 7:30 pm
By all accounts, decedent had health problems, was hard of hearing, legally blind and obviously upset and distraught on the day his long-time spouse died. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 7:17 pm
Being wrong doesn't matter, it's being first that matters.I saw little restraint. [read post]
