Search for: "Matter of Small v State of New York"
Results 281 - 300
of 1,508
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Aug 2013, 2:39 pm
The court ruled that while numerous decisions describe the summons and complaint process authorized by Section 50 of the New York City Criminal Court Act (NYCCCA) and the operation of the Summons All Purpose Part (SAP) in the Criminal Courts of the City of New York, as contained in People v. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 6:02 am
It can only have a marginal effect because of the small residual market value of the bad debt to the lender as would-be seller of the debt that is already deemed “uncollectible. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 6:03 am
" | Enlarged Board of Appeal in G 1/18 | Beyond exclusion of pharmaceutical products from patentable subject matter as a solution to limited access to medicines in Africa | ‘Cartography and Copyright’ | Warhol v Goldsmith: fairness of use by iconic artwork adjudicated in New York. | English High Court raises eyebrows over request to disclose ISP customer data | The EU Regulation on fairness in the platform economy is a let down for intellectual… [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 11:14 am
(New York v. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 6:02 am
It can only have a marginal effect because of the small residual market value of the bad debt to the lender as would-be seller of the debt that is already deemed “uncollectible. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
John Ely cast his representation-reinforcement theory partly as a defense of Warren Court liberalism, though he rejected Roe v. [read post]
12 Mar 2007, 1:57 am
In a New York Times commentary, our colleague Ruth Wedgwood answers, in effect: "Yes, Virginia, there is a grave problem with Bosnia v. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 9:17 am
For those who desire an annotated journey through the President's speech, you may find the following of some value: here (New York Times), here (The Washington Post), and here (NPR). [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 5:41 pm
I joined my two University of Texas colleagues Jeff Tulis and Jeremy Suri in writing an op-ed, published in today's New York Daily News. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 3:00 am
On November 15, 2011, the spectacular Albany courtroom pictured at left was the setting for oral argument before the New York Court of Appeals in Roni LLC v. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 8:05 am
As a child growing up just outside of New York City, I was a big New York Yankees fan. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 3:00 am
The 2010 SpeechNow v. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 3:10 am
The court’s decision in Kalikow v. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 5:25 am
Additional differences arise in the matter in which a state treats another state’s taxes charged to athletes. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 4:00 am
Eminetra.com – Michael Wines (New York Times) | Published: 8/8/2022 Judges in Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana, and Ohio have found Republican legislators illegally drew those states’ congressional maps along racial or partisan lines, or that a trial very likely would conclude they did. [read post]
4 Jan 2014, 9:47 am
” “Health Hazard Progress Notes: Compensation Advance Made in New York State,” 16(5) Asbestos Worker 13 (May 1966). [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 3:00 am
Groups as disparate as the NFL Players Association, Nike, Amazon, and the Mayo Clinic have enlisted help from firms to lobby on the matter. [read post]
14 Sep 2022, 11:59 am
Each of TD, BNY Mellon, and Jefferies agreed to settle with the SEC, but Oppenheimer is litigating the matter in the Southern District of New York (In the Matter of TD Securities (USA) LLC, Release No. 34-95751, September 13, 2022; In the Matter of BNY Mellon Capital Markets, LLC, Release No. 34-95750, September 13, 2022; In the Matter of Jefferies LLC, Release No. 34-95749, September 13, 2022; SEC v. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 12:23 pm
Szalczyk, the Third Circuit—relying on the Supreme Court’s decisions in New York v. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 1:34 pm
“Facially Legitimate and Bona Fide” Mandel, joined by several other American scholars (including Noam Chomsky) brought suit in the Eastern District of New York, seeking “a declaratory judgment that on its face and as applied” that the three relevant statutory provisions were unconstitutional. [read post]
