Search for: "May v. Board of Directors" Results 281 - 300 of 4,822
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Oct 2009, 5:00 am
  "If the purpose was the removal of the Three Directors, then those shareholders would have been better served by supporting an alternative slate of directors in the May 2008 election. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 4:31 am by Tom Kosakowski
"Association Best Practices / Legal RequirementsArticle II: Removed statement of full association mission (which is already in the Articles of Incorporation);Article IV, Section G: Clarifies that Directors do not receive compensation for their service on the Board;Article VI, Section A: Clarifies requirements for meeting notice to match those permitted by the Virginia Nonstock Corporation Act;Article VI, Section C: Reduces the quorum at meetings of the association to 10%… [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 11:41 am by David Jacobson
In Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Rich [2009] NSWSC 1229 Judge Austin decided that ASIC had failed to prove its case against One.Tel director and joint chief executive Jodee Rich and One.Tel's finance director Mark Silbermann. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 5:25 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
USDOL/OALJ Reporter Decisions of the Administrative Review Board May 2015   Graves v. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 5:00 am
  The staff confronted a shareholder proposal that required mandatory reimbursement of proxy expenses for shareholders who nominated a short slate of directors and succeeded in electing at least one to the board. [read post]