Search for: "Mays v. Holland" Results 281 - 300 of 762
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Oct 2015, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
There is still a tension between the ruling of the House of Lords (as it then was) in Campbell v MGN and the subsequent ruling of the European Court of Human Rights in Von Hannover v Germany. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 1:26 pm by Elina Saxena, Quinta Jurecic
As ever, SCOTUSBlog has the details on the case, Bank Markazi v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am by David Kris
(and other) demands for its production, and also to enact laws requiring certain data to be held locally, creating a form of reciprocal pressure.[5]  In this environment, the same action in response to a surveillance directive may be at once both legally required by one government’s laws, and legally forbidden by another’s. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 9:00 pm by Karel Frielink
It would therefore be wise to keep in mind the ruling of the Supreme Court of 6 December 1954 in the case of Holland v United States (348 U.S. 121, 137-138 [1954]): Circumstantial evidence in this respect is intrinsically no different from testimonial evidence. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 4:00 am by Dianne Saxe
Massachusetts v EPA, 549 US 497 (2007); Comer v Murphy Oil USA, 839 F Supp (2d) 849 (SD Miss 2012); Native Village of Kivalina v ExxonMobil Corp, 696 F 3d 849 (9th Cir 2012). [4] Friends of the Earth v Canada (Governor in Council), 2008 FC 1184, aff’d 2009 FCA 297, leave to appeal to the SCC denied, [2009] SCCA 497. [5] Turp v Canada, 2012 FC 893. [read post]
12 Jul 2015, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
The Datonomy blog has a Cyber Update for the week commencing 6 July 2015 Statements in Open Court and Apologies There were statement in open court in the cases of Ben Jackson v MGN [pdf],  Bobbie Holland Hanton and Emma Noble v MGN, read on 8 July 2015 before Mann J. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 9:48 am by Lyle Denniston
**  A request for the Court to clarify the doctrine that a suing party generally can be excused for having missed a filing deadline if it would be unfair to enforce the deadline — a concept that the Court laid down in the 2010 decision in Holland v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 12:05 pm by John Elwood
Circuit misapplied this Court's decision in Holland v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 11:21 am by Quinta Jurecic , Staley Smith
Paul posted about how the Supreme Court’s recent decision in City of Los Angeles v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:00 pm by John Ehrett
United States 14-1145Issue: Whether, under Holland v. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 2:59 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
An order for costs may therefore be made against the trustee personally if the proceedings are unsuccessful. [read post]