Search for: "Miller v. State of Florida"
Results 281 - 300
of 575
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Dec 2014, 4:11 am
Davis v. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 11:30 pm
Since there were almost as many failed banks in Florida as in Georgia, this case will likely foreclose matters in another of the largest state groupings of cases. [read post]
14 Dec 2014, 3:55 pm
Washington Square v. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 2:00 pm
Louisiana, 14-6381 (second relist since the record arrived, fifth overall), concerns the retroactivity of Miller v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 11:05 am
Louisiana, 14-6381, now on its first relist since arrival of the record (but fourth overall), which concerns the retroactivity of the Court’s decision in Miller v. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 12:58 pm
Louisiana, 14-6381, (third relist and still awaiting the record, which is apparently walking from New Orleans) concerns the retroactivity of the Court’s decision in Miller v. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 7:12 am
By Ronald Miller, J.D. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 5:42 am
Louisiana, 14-6381, (second relist) concerns the retroactivity of Miller v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 1:43 pm
Supreme Court decision in Miller v. [read post]
18 Oct 2014, 6:54 am
Matteoni, Matteoni O’Laughlin & Hechtman, San Jose, California, Edward V. [read post]
27 Sep 2014, 10:06 am
See Miller v. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 7:40 am
In the Name of the Child: Race, Gender, and Economics in Adoptive Couple v. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 7:40 am
In the Name of the Child: Race, Gender, and Economics in Adoptive Couple v. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 8:49 am
Florida (2010) and Miller v. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 1:17 pm
Recent Supreme Court cases like Graham and Miller v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
June. 13, 2013), holding essentially that, since those meanies on the United States Supreme Court aren’t letting plaintiffs sue generic manufacturers, we’ll change Alabama common law and let them sue someone else. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 2:53 pm
That was in Lackey v. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 6:48 am
” Miller-El v. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 12:16 pm
See Miller v. [read post]
