Search for: "Newman, Appeal of"
Results 281 - 300
of 1,616
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2021, 8:33 am
Case date: 11 June 2021 Case number: No. 2020-1760 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 11:54 am
This week in Other Barks & Bites: Senators Tillis, Whitehouse, Graham and Blumenthal reintroduce bill to prevent cybercrime amid record year for ransomware attacks; Senators Crapo and Wyden introduce the FABS Act to create a 25% tax credit in domestic semiconductor manufacturing investment; the Federal Circuit affirms a Section 101 invalidation of digital camera patent claims over Judge Pauline Newman’s dissent that the claims cover a mechanical and electronic device; the Patent… [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 8:26 am
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) affirmed the U.S. [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 8:26 am
Judge Pauline Newman dissented. [read post]
13 Jun 2021, 5:18 pm
Newman of the Pittsburgh, PA law office of the Thomas, Thomas & Hafer for bringing this case to my attention. [read post]
11 Jun 2021, 7:37 am
On appeal, the Federal Circuit issued a 2-1 decision affirming with Judge Prost and Taranto in the majority and Judge Newman in dissent. [read post]
24 May 2021, 5:00 am
Newman of the Pittsburgh, PA law office of the Thomas, Thomas & Hafer for bringing this case to my attention. [read post]
14 May 2021, 4:15 am
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) Judge Pauline Newman dissented in part from a decision authored by CAFC Judge Moore yesterday, explaining that, while she agrees that New Vision Gaming’s request for vacatur and remand of two Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) decisions in light of Arthrex, Inc. v. [read post]
14 May 2021, 4:15 am
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) Judge Pauline Newman dissented in part from a decision authored by CAFC Judge Moore yesterday, explaining that, while she agrees that New Vision Gaming’s request for vacatur and remand of two Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) decisions in light of Arthrex, Inc. v. [read post]
13 May 2021, 10:17 am
On appeal, the Federal Circuit did not review the merits, but instead vacated and remanded on Arthrex grounds. [read post]
7 May 2021, 3:00 am
Ervin’s removal order focused primarily on State Bar disciplinary actions against Newman and a Court of Appeals opinion finding that he had engaged in prosecutorial vindictiveness. [read post]
5 May 2021, 9:07 am
Lloyd contended that the Court of Appeal had previously deviated from Markt. [read post]
29 Apr 2021, 1:19 pm
Judge Pauline Newman dissented, arguing that the majority had “set aside the Federal Rules and sound practice for civil trials and appeals. [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 9:27 am
Anderson, 342 U.S. 415, 417 (1952);13 see also Newman-Green, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 12:00 am
Ferrara, named partner at Newman Ferrara LLP. [read post]
13 Apr 2021, 8:21 am
The Court of Appeals (Newman and Pooler) says this is really an ACA case, not a Rehabilitation Act case. [read post]
12 Apr 2021, 8:35 am
” She added, “Nor do we know how, if at all, the testimony of Philonise Floyd might be an issue the defense includes on appeal should Chauvin be convicted. [read post]
12 Apr 2021, 8:35 am
” She added, “Nor do we know how, if at all, the testimony of Philonise Floyd might be an issue the defense includes on appeal should Chauvin be convicted. [read post]
5 Apr 2021, 4:18 pm
Newman’s appeal was dismissed. [read post]
28 Mar 2021, 4:41 pm
The Court of Appeal handed down judgment in Newman v Southampton City Council & Ors [2021] EWCA Civ 437, ruling that the High Court’s balancing exercise, between the privacy of the child in the case and Newman’s right to freedom of expression, had been “conducted with meticulous care” and “demonstrated no error of law”. [read post]
