Search for: "Other Defendants-Class III-a, Class III-b, Class III-c"
Results 281 - 300
of 473
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jul 2013, 7:45 am
When the early phase III results failed to confirm this result, plaintiffs sued Scios Nova for not disclosing the lack of statistically significant outcomes on other measures of kidney function, as well as for its interpretation of dialysis results as statistically significant.[8] The trial court dismissed the complaint.[9] Several securities fraud cases have turned on investor dissatisfaction on how companies interpreted clinical trial subgroup data. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 8:42 am
But other cases so holding involved plaintiffs who lacked statutory or Article III standing in the first place, unlike Henderson, who simply had the bankruptcy trustee step into her shoes as the real party in interest. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 11:38 am
Davila 12-167Issue: Whether the court of appeals erred in holding that any degree of judicial participation in plea negotiations, in violation of Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(c)(1), automatically requires vacatur of a defendant’s guilty plea, irrespective of whether the error prejudiced the defendant. [read post]
3 May 2013, 3:57 am
III. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 3:28 pm
Semenko maintained that she wanted to return to work, but Wendy’s refused to accommodate her by (i) reassigning her to other available positions, or (iii) providing her a reasonable extension on her medical leave. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 12:33 pm
Of course, since this was a Class II device, not a Class III/PMA device, there was no express preemption under Riegel and Lohr, although the court took a while to get there. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 1:49 pm
See 730 ILCS 5/3-6-3(a)(2)(iii). [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 7:46 am
III. [read post]
16 Feb 2013, 8:58 am
PROF'L CONDUCT R. 5.6(b).There are three main public policy rationales for Rule 5.6(b): (i) to ensure the public will have broad access to legal representation; (ii) to prevent awards to plaintiffs that are based on the value of keeping plaintiffs' counsel out of future litigation, rather than the merits of plaintiffs case; and (iii) to limit conflicts of interest. [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 5:08 am
Johnson & Son, Inc., C–09–00927 RMW, 2010 WL 94265 (N.D. [read post]
26 Dec 2012, 6:58 am
After a jury convicted him of “two counts of class C felony stalking” in violation of Indiana Code § 35-45-10-5, Michael D. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 11:54 am
i.andnbsp;andnbsp;andnbsp;andnbsp;andnbsp;andnbsp;andnbsp;andnbsp;andnbsp; Suitability The sale of unsuitable investments is actionable under Rule 10(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act ofandnbsp; 1934, SEC Rule 10b-5.andnbsp; This body of law is premised, in part, on the New York Stock Exchange Rule 405- andldquo;Know Your Customerandrdquo; rule, and is also set forth in FINRAandrsquo;s Conduct Rule IM-2310, which states that:andnbsp; andldquo;In recommending to a customer the… [read post]
28 Oct 2012, 3:00 pm
(II) Any person who violates the provisions of subparagraph (I) of this paragraph (a) commits: (A) A class 4 felony; or (B) A class 3 felony if the violation is committed subsequent to a prior conviction in this or any other state, the United States, or any territory subject to the jurisdiction of the United States of a violation to which subparagraph (I) of this paragraph (a) applies or would apply if committed in this state. [read post]
28 Oct 2012, 3:00 pm
(II) Any person who violates the provisions of subparagraph (I) of this paragraph (a) commits: (A) A class 4 felony; or (B) A class 3 felony if the violation is committed subsequent to a prior conviction in this or any other state, the United States, or any territory subject to the jurisdiction of the United States of a violation to which subparagraph (I) of this paragraph (a) applies or would apply if committed in this state. [read post]
28 Oct 2012, 3:00 pm
(II) Any person who violates the provisions of subparagraph (I) of this paragraph (a) commits: (A) A class 4 felony; or (B) A class 3 felony if the violation is committed subsequent to a prior conviction in this or any other state, the United States, or any territory subject to the jurisdiction of the United States of a violation to which subparagraph (I) of this paragraph (a) applies or would apply if committed in this state. [read post]
28 Oct 2012, 3:00 pm
(II) Any person who violates the provisions of subparagraph (I) of this paragraph (a) commits: (A) A class 4 felony; or (B) A class 3 felony if the violation is committed subsequent to a prior conviction in this or any other state, the United States, or any territory subject to the jurisdiction of the United States of a violation to which subparagraph (I) of this paragraph (a) applies or would apply if committed in this state. [read post]
28 Oct 2012, 2:52 pm
(c) “Secondhand dealer” means any person whose principal business is that of engaging in selling or trading secondhand property. [read post]
28 Oct 2012, 2:52 pm
(III) Paragraph (g) of subsection (1) of this section shall not prohibit the resale of tickets in a secondary market by a person other than the event sponsor or promoter. [read post]
28 Oct 2012, 2:52 pm
(c) “Secondhand dealer” means any person whose principal business is that of engaging in selling or trading secondhand property. [read post]
28 Oct 2012, 2:52 pm
(III) Paragraph (g) of subsection (1) of this section shall not prohibit the resale of tickets in a secondary market by a person other than the event sponsor or promoter. [read post]
