Search for: "People v High"
Results 281 - 300
of 13,354
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2018, 3:00 am
Fraser (1986), the Court said a public high school student couldn’t use sexually explicit language at an assembly, while in Hazelwood v. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
In 1969, in Tinker v. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 5:52 am
People v. [read post]
1 May 2018, 2:50 am
Marshall won 29 out of 32 cases he argued in front of the high court, including Brown v. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 4:15 am
In Griffith v. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 2:47 pm
People don't do anything without reasons. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 11:44 am
Certainly didn't help him avoid the death penalty, and might have even contributed to it.(3) Patently improper arguments can be made even in high-profile death penalty cases. [read post]
21 May 2009, 10:11 am
Since obviously prosecuting high-profile cases at trial is quite a piece different than doing appointed appellate work.So I checked it out. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 3:17 pm
Most of the rest, in the dozens, were skin and bones from starvation, suffering from infection, flea-ridden to a life-threatening degree, worm-infested, panting in cages exposed to the remote area's high temperature that day, putrefying with open sores, malnourished, injured, and/or battle-scarred from fights over food. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 11:50 am
Two days after the voicemail, a visibly shaken Basil reported the voicemail to the El Cajon police, who listened to the tape and thought the caller was pretty clearly high or on prescription drugs when the call was made. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 12:00 pm
AT&T v. [read post]
5 May 2017, 2:35 pm
” The parties in DM v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 6:35 am
Yesterday, the NY Court of Appeals decided People v. [read post]
25 May 2015, 4:31 am
In the Iowa case, Strough v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 4:02 pm
Last week’s oral argument in HHS v. [read post]
29 Jan 2025, 3:15 pm
During his appearance in U.S. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2025, 3:15 pm
During his appearance in U.S. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 2:38 pm
DUI REDUCED to Reckless Driving – State v. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 4:28 am
A nuisance action was upheld in Walker v Brewster (1867) 5 LR Eq 25 (Ch). where the defendant’s fetes attracted people who sat on a wall adjoining the plaintiff’s property, destroying their privacy. [read post]
9 Feb 2013, 12:32 pm
Since “[t]he issue before the Court is whether” the risk implicated by the three-drug protocol is too high; and Justices Thomas and Justice Scalia “say there’s no such thing as a” risk that’s too high for Eighth Amendment purposes; then “you have to discount the people who would not” look at any risk of severe pain as being too high to violate the Eighth Amendment. [read post]
