Search for: "People v Perry"
Results 281 - 300
of 880
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Feb 2015, 12:31 pm
Perry, 548 U.S. 399, 515-18 (2006) (Scalia, J., dissenting in part). [3] Romer v. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm
In Coleman v. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm
Perry, in which it could have—but did not—decided that issue. [read post]
17 Jan 2015, 3:13 am
Supreme Court’s standing ruling in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 12:30 pm
Perry, but to strike down Section 3 of DOMA as unconstitutional in United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 1:05 pm
Perhaps courts can't base (or, at least, publicly admit that their basing their decisions) exclusively on "possible effects," but, going back to Marbury and foreword to the embarrassing decision a couple of years ago finding a lack of standing in Perry v. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 4:19 pm
Perry, is headed up by the very formidable Neel Lane of Akin Gump. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 11:17 am
Jenkins v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 9:02 am
” Meshell v. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 12:23 am
Merpel feels that a failure to have Knight bound by law -- if not by hand and foot -- to stop him filing other people's IP and then harassing them is an unsightly blot on the fair and improving landscape of IP litigation: if she only knew how to spell pusalliminuous, pusillenanious, pussylanimous pusillanimous she'd be using it right now ...Some further reading on recent cases involving naughty litigants: Successful claimants in design infringement action jailed for… [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 11:41 am
Perry and with Justice Scalia’s dissent in United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 4:35 pm
Perry.) [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 9:30 pm
In United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 12:52 pm
The petition in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 7:20 am
Our legislature has thus caught up with the 2013 ruling and result in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court wrote its Hollingsworth v. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 7:11 am
You’ve got to have people in the classrooms—that’s your first priority. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 10:01 am
State v. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm
Perry Thurston has been a somewhat under-the-radar race. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 9:35 am
See 705 F.Supp. 2d at 485 (citing Perry v. [read post]
