Search for: "People v. Cole" Results 281 - 300 of 448
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Dec 2011, 1:48 pm by Steve Vladeck
”) In this post, we will address David Cole’s concerns about the relationship between the AUMF detention authority and the laws of war. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:43 pm by Steve Vladeck
 It might well convey to the world that the American legislature views military detention as an unremarkable, even preferred, option in some terrorism cases, thereby blurring the important message the President has been endeavoring to convey, through word and practice, that“[t]he strong preference of this Administration is to accomplish [incapacitation of persons who are threats to the American people] through prosecution. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:20 pm by Marty Lederman
”) In this post, we will address David Cole’s concerns about the relationship between the AUMF detention authority and the laws of war. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:19 pm by Marty Lederman
 It might well convey to the world that the American legislature views military detention as an unremarkable, even preferred, option in some terrorism cases, thereby blurring the important message the President has been endeavoring to convey, through word and practice, that “[t]he strong preference of this Administration is to accomplish [incapacitation of persons who are threats to the American people] through prosecution. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 3:56 am by Joel R. Brandes
Third Department Affirms Initial Custody Award Made without Evidentary Hearing In Matter of Cole v Cole, --- N.Y.S.2d ----, 2011 WL 4975299, 2011 N.Y. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
Two of them concerned Cheryl Cole’s brother, Garry Tweedy, who had been wrongly accused by Heat magazine and the Daily Star of having a criminal record (on the basis of a false Facebook profile). [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 9:17 am by INFORRM
  One was obtained earlier in the year by singer Cheryl Cole – following precedents set by Sienna Miller and Lily Allen. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 5:33 am by INFORRM
  This point was considered in the case of Howlett v Holding ([2006] EWHC 41 (QB)). [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 5:55 pm by INFORRM
. “Identifiable” material would be treated differently from “non-identifiable” content, with the aspiration “that, over time, people will pay less attention to and take less notice of material which is anonymous”. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 1:16 pm by Julie Lam
The Court granted the application for leave to appeal in People v Cole, No. 143046, and invited the Prosecuting Attorneys Association of Michigan and the Criminal Defense Attorneys of Michigan to file briefs amicus curiae. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 9:36 am by Schachtman
”[ii] Judges, like most people, glibly assumed that what people normally or customarily do is reasonable. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 11:27 am by Gritsforbreakfast
In 2001, just months after Perry's ascension to Governor, the US Supreme Court ruled in Atwater v. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 9:23 am by nflatow
Professor Cole was counsel for the Humanitarian Law Project in Holder v. [read post]