Search for: "People v. Downing (1985)"
Results 281 - 300
of 509
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jul 2014, 9:03 am
Over 20 years ago, in 1993, the United States Supreme Court handed down its Daubert decision. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 8:05 pm
It does not actually put people on notice that it prohibits such advertisements. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 12:59 pm
The system had let him down in localized and idiosyncratic ways. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 12:59 pm
The system had let him down in localized and idiosyncratic ways. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 2:39 pm
Forensic Justice Project v. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 12:22 pm
Doesn’t believe patent promotes innovation either, where patent mills are shaking down companies systematically. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 2:12 pm
Here’s an excerpt: On June 30, 2014, the Supreme Court handed down its decision in Harris v. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 5:49 am
According to the plaintiff, he was needed five days per week, and he didn’t think he had any choice but to come in that frequently because otherwise, he “would be letting [the director of student life] down, and would be letting the school down. [read post]
23 May 2014, 11:37 am
The war was largely over by 1985, with the army in firm control of most of the population. [read post]
19 May 2014, 10:52 am
Nation Enterprises (1985)); but I still think a copier’s fair use argument in such a situation is quite strong. [read post]
18 May 2014, 9:01 pm
Jaffree (1985) had no problem with another state law that required a simple “period of silence, not to exceed one minute. [read post]
15 May 2014, 2:04 pm
The strongest precedent for Dina would be Worldwide Church of God v. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] New York’s ‘aggravated harassment’ statute is unconstitutionally overbroad and vague
13 May 2014, 1:08 pm
In People v Dietze (75 NY2d 47 [1989]), this Court struck down a similar harassment statute, former Penal Law § 240.25, which prohibited the use of abusive or obscene language with the intent to harass, annoy or alarm another person. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 7:32 am
Jaffree, 472 U.S. 38, 52-53 (1985) (likewise). [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 4:17 am
Courts have not slipped down the slope towards accommodating heinous religious practices that seriously harm others. [read post]
8 Feb 2014, 4:48 am
The tenancy agreement stated the property was suitable for 6 people. [read post]
8 Feb 2014, 4:48 am
The tenancy agreement stated the property was suitable for 6 people. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 3:36 pm
I'll try to break this all down below the fold . . . [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 5:10 pm
City of Eau Claire (1985). [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 4:30 am
Evidence Act) were legislated into hurried existence in the late 1960’s, in response to the decision in, Myers v. [read post]
