Search for: "People v. Hale"
Results 281 - 300
of 381
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Dec 2019, 4:05 pm
Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings in media law cases are outstanding: W M Morrison Supermarkets plc v Various Claimants, heard 6 and 7 November 2019 (Lady Hale and Lords Reed, Kerr, Hodge and Lloyd-Jones) Turley v Unite the Union, heard 11 to 15 and 19 November 2019 (Nicklin J) Kirkegaard v Smith, heard 26 November 2019 (Julian Knowles J). [read post]
International human rights can help reverse yet another heavy blow on sexual and reproductive health
25 Jun 2017, 5:07 am
Editor’s note: The appellant in R (o.t.a A and B) v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 1:00 pm
McIntyre Machinery, Ltd. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2024, 9:29 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
10 May 2019, 4:48 pm
These cases range from ZH (Tanzania) v SSHD [2011] UKSC 4 (an immigration case) and ETK v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 439 through to PJS v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2016] UKSC 26. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 10:46 am
And they do not realize that because increasing numbers of these people are innocents, convi [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 12:33 pm
A simple overruling of Nevada v. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 11:32 pm
In Bowman v Secular Society Limited [1917] AC 406 at 457, Lord Sumner refers to the older Taylor’s case of 1676 1 Vent, as follows: ‘…and Hale said that such kind of wicked blasphemous words were not only an offence to God and religion, but a crime against the Laws, State, and Government, and therefore punishable in this Court. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court evaluated sobriety checkpoints (at which everyone must stop and submit to observation and answer some questions) under the Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable seizures, Justice Stevens, in Michigan Dept. of State Police v. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 9:14 am
., v SBR Marketing Ltd., 11-CV-00304 (D. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 7:46 pm
” In 1994, in Dolan v. [read post]
29 Oct 2021, 2:23 pm
The North Carolina Supreme Court in 1843's State v. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 7:38 am
It is hard to find people who do not admire that statement. [read post]
8 Dec 2019, 4:03 pm
On the 6 December 2016 Channel 4 News has issued an apology after a subtitling error wrongly claimed Boris Johnson had discussed whether “people of colour” should be allowed into the UK, in reality, Johnson said he was in favour of having “people of talent” come to the UK, and did not discuss race. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 6:11 am
In MacLennan the court focussed on four of Lady Hale’s propositions; 1. [read post]
20 May 2022, 11:43 pm
The Court held by four to one – Lady Hale JSC dissenting – that a Methodist minister was not, in fact, an employee. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 3:43 am
Hale the court found the error harmless because of “overwhelming” evidence of guilt, but just two years earlier had held in State v. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 6:46 am
The Supreme Court of Canada has issued its decision in Google Inc v Equustek (28 June 2017). [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 6:46 am
The Supreme Court of Canada has issued its decision in Google Inc v Equustek (28 June 2017). [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 4:48 am
R (Smith) v Secretary of State for Defence & Anor [2010] UKSC 29 JUDGMENT The Supreme Court allowed the appeal on the jurisdiction issue (Lady Hale, Lord Mance and Lord Kerr dissenting) and unanimously dismissed the appeal on the inquest issue. [read post]
