Search for: "People v. Souter"
Results 281 - 300
of 462
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2010, 6:50 am
Florida and Sullivan v. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 5:27 pm
For example, both Bush v. [read post]
29 May 2024, 3:33 pm
Snell v. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 6:03 pm
Scalia is in turn paraphrasing Souter; he adds, “We do not disagree. [read post]
12 Apr 2020, 9:01 pm
Thus, twenty years ago, in Bush v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 11:40 am
S. ____, ____ (1991) (slip op., at ___) (Souter, J., joined by Kennedy, J., concurring); Arizona v. [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 1:58 pm
It echo's the recent dissent of Justice David Souter in Bowles v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 6:00 am
Munaf v. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 12:16 pm
See Roper v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 3:09 am
A search of the Finnish Surname Register gave the answer that the number of people resident in Finland with the surname Souter is “less than five”, together with the legend. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 7:36 am
Over the weekend the New York Times ran a story by Adam Liptak previewing a US Supreme Court case ("Justices revisit rule requiring lab testimony," Dec. 19) called Briscoe v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 9:22 am
Finally, SOC was not adverse to delving into casual cruelty toward Indian people. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 9:00 pm
Only Bill Clinton-appointed Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Bush I-appointed David Souter. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 8:20 am
Wade, and Engel v. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 9:58 am
Xiyin Tang, Against Fair Use: The Case for Genericide Defenses in Artistic Works Rogers v. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 3:59 pm
" 70,000 people in the US are over 100. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 5:11 am
Sentencing Commission Six Years after U.S. v. [read post]
30 Aug 2008, 5:11 am
The petition in Kelly v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 7:16 am
Representative Steve King (R-Iowa), one of the bill’s drafters, testified that the bill would expand public access to the courts; although millions of people can watch the Super Bowl, he noted, the Supreme Court decides momentous cases like Bush v. [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 12:18 am
There's no other explanation.I was reminded of this the other day when I underwent the dreary ordeal of re-reading Justice Ginsburg's recent opinion in Cunningham v. [read post]
