Search for: "People v. Spellings"
Results 281 - 300
of 1,015
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2011, 8:04 am
I do not understand these instruments to require absolute or complete independence. [177] The Constitution enshrines the rights of all people in South Africa. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 2:49 am
Anyway, he offers the following: "Never put your faith in a spell checker; when you reed it back, it'll always let you down in the most embarrassing plaices" [The IPKat gave up using spell checkers when he started writing about trade marks, so many of which are classified as spelling errors]. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 2:58 am
Teaching criminal law at Fordham Law School, John Pfaff posts at PrawfsBlawg about the Supreme Court's recent decision in Cavazos v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 6:52 am
PARISIAN TRANSCRIPTS 2.0 We had a number of people send us material after our first post with out list of deposition transcripts (and various other items) concerning the testimony of the extremely active plaintiffs’ side expert, Dr. [read post]
15 Mar 2014, 5:12 pm
In Smith v. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 9:10 am
In Magner v. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 5:41 am
See Sanchez v. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 5:57 pm
This one (Federal Express v. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 7:11 pm
Article 23 of the Constitution of Uganda[1] spells out the right to personal liberty under Ugandan law. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 9:42 am
In Durham v. [read post]
25 Oct 2006, 8:36 am
" (People v Selassie, 140 Misc.2d 616, 619 [NY Sup Ct Bronx County 1988].) [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 7:49 pm
His commentary on Epic v. [read post]
9 Feb 2013, 7:39 am
The Act provides immunities and defenses for legitimate “patients” and “caregivers”, but pecuniary schemes like the one at issue in this casenote are clearly not protected by the MMMA.Compassionate Apothecary, a medical marijuana dispensary, or “provisioning center”, was the business model that underwent recent scrutiny by the Michigan Supreme Court in People v McQueen. [read post]
14 Aug 2015, 2:35 am
The case of Target Australia Pty Ltd v Catchoftheday.com.au Pty Ltd [2015] ATMO 54, decided in June, aimed to answer this question in the fair land of Australia. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 9:42 am
While we're about it, this Kat continues to wonder why OHIM insists in spelling 'Harmonisation' with a 'z' when the Community Trade Mark Regulation spells it with an 's'. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 3:55 am
The fact that the New York City Police Department has openly and flagrantly chosen to ignore DeBour (that's the New York flavor of Terry v. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 11:59 am
One example is Shutterstock which has been sued by a group of those filling “image reviewer” positions, claiming that given the guidance spelled out in the Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2017, 12:54 pm
Supreme Court issued a significant decision, Honeycutt v. [read post]
2 Aug 2017, 12:54 pm
Supreme Court issued a significant decision, Honeycutt v. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 5:08 am
See Range v. [read post]
