Search for: "People v. Strong (1994)" Results 281 - 300 of 329
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Apr 2010, 8:59 am by Tom Goldstein
Supreme Court retirements inevitably produce much more coverage of process than substance. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 1:01 pm by Betsy McKenzie
He became the senior justice in 1994 with the retirement of Justice Harry A. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 8:12 pm by Brian Shiffrin
Previously, the New York Court of Appeals had affirmed a rejection of that claim (People v Ramchair, 8 NY3d 313, 316 [2007]) reasoning that appellate counsel's brief to the Appellate Division had been “comprehensive,” and the arguments raised therein “strong” (Id.). [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 10:14 am by Hilde
Since 1994, Stevens has been the senior Associate Justice and so has been responsible for assigning opinions when the Chief Justice is not in the majority. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 5:09 am by Dr. Jillian T. Weiss
Lodge 837, Int'l Ass'n of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, 26 F.3d 842, 848 (8th Cir.1994). [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 12:00 am
(IP Watch)   Canada EU demands for trade deal would reshape Canadian IP law (Michael Geist) Federal Court considers colour marks: Peak Innovations Inc v Simpson Strong Tie Company (Canadian Trademark Blog)   China China’s standards and patent innovation proposals: problems for IPR and global trade? [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 7:35 am
                    Introduction  There is an ongoing debate among the media and cheer world as to whether or not cheerleading should be recognized as a sport under Title IX.[1] A recent poll found that 60% of people thought cheerleading was a sport, while 35% did not.[2] Cheerleaders sometimes argue for this… [read post]
21 May 2009, 12:00 am
There is no evidence as to why people took licences. [read post]