Search for: "People v. Wells (1970)" Results 281 - 300 of 1,131
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Apr 2020, 3:44 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
The fact that the case has taken so long to decide tells you there's a likely intense, behind-the-scenes disagreement among judges over how to proceed.There's little scientific justification remaining behind the central tenets of Zani v. [read post]
18 Mar 2020, 10:10 am by Eugene Volokh
Mich.), and the ACLU of Michigan just filed an excellent amicus brief that I think summarizes the facts and the law very well, and explains why the plaintiffs should lose. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 7:08 am by Ronald Collins
Unlike any of my prior writings, the book is intended for a popular audience: people intrigued by how the Supreme Court decides cases as well as people who care deeply about the climate issue. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Ceballos, 547 U.S. 410 (2006), and Lane v. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 4:00 am by Gary P. Rodrigues
Then in 1973 the Supreme Court of Canada case Calder v. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Both have skyrocketed since the 1970s. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 11:29 am by Patricia Hughes
However, it was also the rule of law that advanced religious freedom in Canada (in the 1959 Supreme Court of Canada decision in Roncarelli v. [read post]
23 Feb 2020, 9:54 am by Schachtman
” Against Nace’s scatalogical Jackson Pollack approach, Smith is silent about another plaintiffs’ expert witness, William McBride, who was found guilty of scientific fraud.[3] Smith reports interviews of several well-known, well-respected evidence scholars. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 9:00 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Panel 3: CopyrightSarah Polcz, Loyalties v. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 1:52 pm by Stephen Griffin
  They worked for years to reverse this common understanding of the 1970s, and they had plenty of help. [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 2:48 am by SHG
The battle for Equal Rights for women in the 1970s isn’t the same battle as today. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 3:00 am by Jack Sharman
The usual concepts – justice, productivity, money, honor – are not well-explored in the day-in, day-out of law practice. [read post]
29 Dec 2019, 7:23 pm
But the perils of increasingly intimate supervision — and the subtle way it can mold how people act — have also led some to worry whether anyone will truly know when all this surveillance has gone too far. 'Graduates will be well prepared … to embrace 24/7 government tracking and social credit systems,” one commenter on the Slashdot message board said. [read post]
26 Dec 2019, 1:50 pm by Eugene Volokh
Superior Court (2018) 4 Cal.5th 607, 632 [discussing 2000 article on deterrence effects of reporting potentially violent patients], People v. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm by Ronald Collins
But by the end of the Warren Court, incorporation had become the norm, except for a couple of well-established exceptions (basically, the Seventh Amendment and the Fifth Amendment’s grand jury clause). [read post]