Search for: "Power v. Holder"
Results 281 - 300
of 2,821
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2022, 7:00 am
This post was prepared for a roundtable on Constitutional Faith and Veneration, convened as part of LevinsonFest 2022—a year-long series gathering scholars from diverse disciplines and viewpoints to reflect on Sandy Levinson’s influential work in constitutional law. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 10:47 pm
Gilstrap, who is presiding over two Ericsson v. [read post]
2 Jun 2022, 1:53 pm
State v. [read post]
25 May 2022, 3:26 pm
Instead, for as-applied challenges, the Court in Holder v. [read post]
23 May 2022, 10:16 am
Tiburon Open Space Committee v. [read post]
20 May 2022, 1:56 pm
For example, my amicus brief in Espinoza v. [read post]
19 May 2022, 10:01 am
But the bottom line is that they urge the ITC, a U.S. trade agency with the quasijudicial power to order import bans against infringing products, to seriously consider whether monetary relief would be sufficient to make SEP holders (in this case, Philips) whole. [read post]
19 May 2022, 9:24 am
Patel v. [read post]
18 May 2022, 9:01 pm
That was the knock, of course, on the infamous (and thoroughly discredited) Bush v. [read post]
16 May 2022, 4:00 am
MSNBC’s Andrea Mitchell and former Clinton Attorney General Eric Holder had a preposterous discussion of how if Roe goes down, Brown v. [read post]
14 May 2022, 3:20 am
Holder, Rucho v. [read post]
12 May 2022, 7:21 am
Also important is Russia’s defiance of the provisional orders issued by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) on March 16 in the case of Ukraine v. [read post]
8 May 2022, 1:43 am
The latter restricts the Registrar’s power to act pre-grant for the protection of section 5 rights. [read post]
4 May 2022, 5:01 am
One judge doubts that resurrecting the use of Congress’s inherent power to sanction contempt remains a realistic option. [read post]
2 May 2022, 7:42 am
The hiQ v. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 6:30 am
Elsewhere I discuss the potential benefits of mandatory retirement ages and 18-year single term approaches.[6]Here I discuss an alternative approach that Congress could constitutionally effectuate by statute and that might avoid at least some of the risks of being viewed as a naked partisan power grab inviting further partisan power grabs back. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 5:55 am
Who’s going to have the power in our country? [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 7:48 am
The Supreme Court in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 12:00 am
The court emphasised the general principle that a company concerns itself only with registered holders of its shares. [read post]
18 Apr 2022, 8:45 pm
Holder, 556 U.S. 418, 433 (2009); Weinberger v. [read post]
