Search for: "Purple Party"
Results 281 - 300
of 542
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2015, 8:58 am
Since you talk about it so much at parties and in bars, it's high time you read it. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 4:12 pm
In April 2014, the NLRB issued a notice and invitation to the parties in a case involving Purple Communications, Inc. and interested amici curiae to file briefs on whether Register Guard should be overruled. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 8:11 am
If women like purple, then why should any competitor be denied the color purple? [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 6:57 am
Due diligence is warranted before using a third-party service that may have access to confidential client information. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 9:15 am
Marshalls Service to enforce federal court orders instead of leaving it to private parties. [read post]
3 Jan 2015, 6:54 am
" Tarini Parti of Politico.com has this report. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 12:26 am
My prediction is we will hear a lot more of these kinds of critical statements as Clegg vies to slough off the image he has gained as a ‘Wotless’ (Frazzy assures me this is a Caribbean term) side-kick and re-brand himself as a credible politician in charge of a credible party. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 2:01 pm
The majority explained that email communications have become the primary means for discussion in the workplace and that a physically disconnected workforce depends on emails for interaction with co-workers, as well as with third parties. [read post]
14 Dec 2014, 5:56 pm
Members Miscimarra and Johnson filed separate dissenting opinions (Purple Communications, Inc., December 11, 2014). [read post]
13 Dec 2014, 12:35 am
Today's post was shared by Steven Greenhouse and comes from www.bizjournals.com The National Labor Relations Board ruled Thursday that employees can use their employer's email systems for union organizing communications during nonwork hours.The decision, in a case involving Purple Communications, applies to employees who already had been granted access to their employer's email systems. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 12:20 pm
The Board issued a notice in the case, Purple Communications, Inc., Case Nos. 21-CA-095151, 21-RC-091531, and 21-RC-091584, inviting interested parties to file amicus briefs by June 16, 2014. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 10:55 am
Not surprisingly, the Board’s decision fell upon party lines with the three Democrat appointees in the majority and the two Republican appointees dissenting. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 9:51 am
Significantly, the decision retroactively applies, including having application to the parties in the cases and all other pending matters. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 5:02 am
That case is Purple Communications. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 11:01 am
The NLRB declined to address email access by third parties or other types of electronic communications systems, as they were not at issue in the case. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 2:49 am
[No]Test Your TTAB Judge-Ability on these Five Section 2(d) AppealsSUNNY HAZE Confusable With PURPLE HAZE for Beer, Says TTABTTAB Finds "SWISSCODE" Not Confusable With "SKINCODE 2 & Design" for CosmeticsCaterpillar Conquers BIG CAT in TTAB 2(d) OppositionQuadruple WYHA? [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 3:02 am
Or is this like the recent PURPLE HAZE case, where the Board observed that those consumers who were unaware of the Jimi Hendrix classic would find the mark confusable with SUNNY HAZE? [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 3:35 am
The limited number of third-party registrations and Internet uses submitted by applicant were of little probative value vis-a-vis the strength of the PURPLE HAZE mark. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 4:31 pm
The President, her party's leader, comes to her state, and she avoids him? [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 1:19 pm
It should be noted that the Board is currently considering the issue of whether employees should have a right to use an employer’s email to engage in protected activity in Purple Communications, Inc. [read post]
