Search for: "Range v. Range"
Results 281 - 300
of 20,067
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jan 2016, 10:55 am
In Akzo v. [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 11:00 am
Stevens, 25 F.3d 318 (6th Cir. 1994) and Oliver v. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 9:29 am
The New Jersey Law Journal contains an article concerning the continuing struggles of federal district courts to come to terms with the discretion which the Supreme Court granted to them in sentencing in U.S. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 1:53 pm
In United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 1:33 am
On 14 June 2012, the Supreme Court heard an appeal in The Rugby Football Union v Viagogo Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 1585, a case likely to clarify the threshold for obtaining Norwich Pharmacal disclosure orders and have wide-ranging implications for those seeking to curtail the resale of events tickets on the black market. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 7:10 pm
Therefore if claim 2 covers the range from 0.0001% w/v-5% w/v, claim 1 must cover at least that range. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 7:24 am
One of the landmark cases on parental alienation and custody modification in New York is Tropea v. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 8:41 am
” KSR Int’l Co. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2016, 9:22 am
In United States v. [read post]
11 Dec 2007, 9:41 am
" in Gall v. [read post]
11 Jun 2023, 7:22 pm
Last week the Third Circuit en banc decided Range v. [read post]
22 Jun 2007, 4:55 am
In Rita v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 8:55 am
Why, then, did Paul Clement, the chief challenger to the law, keep mentioning Buckley v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 9:31 am
Co. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 9:05 am
“The guidelines recommended 70-87 months, but that was based on defendant’s high drug weight, which substantially inflated his range and overstated the seriousness of [...] [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 8:35 am
“[S]ection 1B1.10 takes for granted that a defendant who received a ‘downward departure’ in the pre-Booker era received a specific term of imprisonment below his applicable range. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 11:31 am
Sentencing Guidelines Where the sentencing court made no reference to the guideline range at all, the sentence must be vacated. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 10:48 am
Sentencing Crack cocaine; limited remand Where the disparity between crack and powder cocaine sentences would not have affected a career-offender’s guideline range, he is not entitled to a limited remand. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 10:08 am
He found that an above-range sentence was appropriate because Schlueter conned not just vulnerable victims out of large sums of money, but because he took advantage of personal relationships [...] [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 11:08 am
Sentencing Reasonableness Where the district court calculated a sentencing range of 57 to 71 months, but imposed a 240-month sentence based on unsubstantiated speculation about the defendant’s prior criminal conduct and likelihood of recidivism, the sentence must be vacated. [read post]
