Search for: "Roche v. Roche" Results 281 - 300 of 925
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2011, 8:06 pm by Patent Docs
June 27-30, 2011 - BIO International Convention (Biotechnology Industry Organization) - Washington, DC June 29-30, 2011 - Pharmaceutical Portfolio & Product Life Cycle Management (SMi Group) - London, UK July 8, 2011 - Stanford v. [read post]
25 Sep 2011, 9:07 pm by Patent Docs
September 26-27, 2011 - Biosimilars and Biobetters*** (SMi Group) - London, UK September 26-27, 2011 - Life Sciences Business Development & Acquisitions in Emerging Markets (American Conference Institute) - New York, NYNew York, NY September 28, 2011 - The Impact of Stanford v. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 7:57 am
Another dreary day in Londontown, but the IPKat Team is here to wish you a very happy day filled with intellectual property goodness.US Supreme Court to hear Stanford v Roche patent fight: Yesterday the US Supreme Court justices agreed to hear Stanford University's claim against Roche Holding AG in respect of patents for methods of testing the effectiveness of AIDS treatments by measuring the HIV concentration in blood plasma. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 7:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]     Highlights this week included: Intergovernmental Meeting on Pandemic Influenza Preparedness, Geneva: tension over IP issues related to virus and vaccine sharing (Intellectual Property Watch) (Intellectual Property Watch) Actos (Pioglitazone) – US: CAFC affirms attorney fee of over $16 million in connection with ANDA patent challenge: Takeda v… [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 3:28 am by Joel R. Brandes
[Iceland] [Habitual Residence] Roche v Hartz, 2011 WL 841556 (N.D.Ohio) [Australia] [One Year Statute of Limitations] Boehm v Boehm, 2011 WL 863066 (M.D.Fla.) [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 2:28 am
Just after Primus/Roche (in which I acted for Primus) I wrote that a case such as this is different from Primus-Roche, in which each of the Roche entities only infringed in their own country. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 8:10 am by Bexis
Roche Laboratories, 684 P.2d 1187, 1189 (N.M. [read post]