Search for: "SEALED APPELLANT 1" Results 281 - 300 of 680
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Mar 2017, 1:44 pm by Annette Burns
 The appellate court found that children do have a right to privacy, and the trial court had the authority to seal the children’s records over the objection of a parent. [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 8:44 am by Holland & Hart
But the appellate court also found that Hawg Tools failed to provide sufficient evidence that its design was in fact a trade secret. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 9:13 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
§ 636(b)(1) (extending time to file objections from ten to fourteen days). [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 6:34 pm by Robichaud
Clear rules on how sentencing courts must approach these presumptions whether a 64(1) order is appropriate. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 11:37 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
Because [appellant] is the grantee of a quitclaim deed, he cannot be a bona fide purchaser. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 11:37 pm by Wolfgang Demino
Because [appellant] is the grantee of a quitclaim deed, he cannot be a bona fide purchaser. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 10:05 pm by Jeff Richardson
  It is about 2" tall and about 1.75" across, and about 1" deep. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 10:07 am by Eugene Volokh
(If you’re interested, you can read the cert. petition, the brief in opposition and the reply by clicking on “Documents” here; you can also read an amicus brief, which I wrote on behalf of nine law professors, including myself, here.) 1. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 2:40 am by Roel van Woudenberg
Appellants I and II (opponents 02 and 01) each lodged an appeal against the decision of the opposition division rejecting their oppositions against European patent No. 1 961 632.II. [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 3:45 am by Simon Holzer
Prior decisions of the Federal Patent Court that backed appellants’ positions usually touched procedural issues or the parties’ standing to sue. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 6:48 am
This post examines an opinion from the Oregon Supreme Court: State v. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 1:24 pm by Jay
  (See 1-3 California Environmental Law & Land Use Practice § 3.48.)However, in premises cases, you are generally dealing with large companies with plenty of assets. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 9:20 am by Abbott & Kindermann
§ 1533(b)(1)(A); that the population of bearded seals was plentiful; that a lack of reliable population data made it impossible to determine an extinction threshold; that NMFS’s use of predictive climate projections beyond 2050 were speculative; that NMFS had unreasonably “changed tack” from its previous Arctic sea-ice listing decisions; and that NMFS had failed to demonstrate a causal connection between the loss of sea ice and the impact of that loss to the… [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 1:20 am by Glen C. Hansen
§ 1533(b)(1)(A); that the population of bearded seals was plentiful; that a lack of reliable population data made it impossible to determine an extinction threshold; that NMFS’s use of predictive climate projections beyond 2050 were speculative; that NMFS had unreasonably “changed tack” from its previous Arctic sea-ice listing decisions; and that NMFS had failed to demonstrate a causal connection between the loss of sea ice and the impact of that loss to the… [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 5:31 am by Legal Beagle
The full opinion of Lord Brodie:HIGH COURT OF JUSTICIARY [2016] HCJAC 93 HCA/2016-24/XJNOTE BY LORD BRODIE in BILL OF SUSPENSION by CLYDE AND CO (SCOTLAND) LLP Complainers;against THE PROCURATOR FISCAL, EDINBURGH Respondent:Complainers:  Smith QC; Clyde & CoRespondent:  No appearance22 July 2016[1]        The complainers in this bill of suspension are a limited liability partnership, being solicitors with a place of business at Albany House,… [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 4:18 am
Section 2(e)(1) - Mere Descriptiveness: TTAB Test: Is PROBOKNOW Merely Descriptive of a Legal Services Website? [read post]