Search for: "SEARS ROEBUCK AND CO. "
Results 281 - 300
of 338
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jun 2009, 2:24 am
Sears, Roebuck & Co., a carpenter had four fingers of his dominant hand fully amputated and reattached. [read post]
5 Oct 2012, 12:50 pm
Sears Roebuck & Co., 138 N.J. 2, 18 (1994). [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 8:51 pm
Sears Roebuck & Co. 138 N.J. 2, 21-23 (1994) In an ordinary breach-of-contract case, the function of damages is simply to make the injured party whole, and courts do not assess penalties against the breaching party. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 11:48 am
Sears, Roebuck & Co., Inc., 586 F.2d 382 (5th Cir. 1978). [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 2:47 am
Sears, Roebuck & Co.), conceded that this left open a distinct issue of judge-shopping, one that his colleague Judge Easterbrook had identified long ago in In re Bridgestone/Firestone. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 9:29 am
Sears, Roebuck & Co., 859 So.2d 1207, 1209 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003). [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 9:54 am
Sears, Roebuck & Co., No. 10-1087 (U.S. pet. for cert. filed Mar. 2, 2011). [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 5:31 am
Sears, Roebuck & Co., 547 F.3d 742 (7th Cir. 2008), observing that by ensuring that the class action is premised on the realistic prospect of a remedy that the class members could not otherwise obtain, the court is also protecting the interests of absent class members, who may have different interests than those of class action lawyers who want to obtain a fee for providing the same or similar relief. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 4:00 am
Sears, Roebuck & Co (Internet Cases) US Patents – Decisions District Court N D California orders stay in patent infringement case filed by Rambus against Micron, Samsung and Nanya (IP Watchdog) (Law360) District Court N D California: Judge denies Hynix bid to revisit Rambus ruling (Law360) US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Cisco Systems – Teles accuses Cisco of infringing newly issued patent relating to… [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 8:20 pm
Sears, Roebuck & Co. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 8:19 am
This is a smokin' hot subject, particularly in light of the ADA Amendments Act and its regulations, which expand the ADA's coverage to a dramatically larger population, the "new," more activist EEOC under Chair Jacqueline Berrien, and two recent multi-million-dollar settlements in leave-of-absence lawsuits brought by the EEOC against Sears, Roebuck & Co. and Supervalu, Inc. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 7:31 am
Sears Roebuck & Co., Inc. (2nd Dept. 1986) - $1,000,000 for loss of eye following car accident Stiuso v. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 10:37 am
Sears, Roebuck & Co. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 2:47 am
Sears, Roebuck & Co.), conceded that this left open a distinct issue of judge-shopping, one that his colleague Judge Easterbrook had identified long ago in In re Bridgestone/Firestone. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 3:51 pm
Sears Roebuck & Co., 138 N.J. 2 (1994), stating: In 1960, the Legislature passed the Consumer Fraud Act “to permit the Attorney General to combat the increasingly widespread practice of defrauding the consumer. [read post]
22 Oct 2008, 9:32 pm
Sears, Roebuck & Co., 722 F.2d 1542, 1548 (Fed. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 10:00 pm
Sunset Manor Co., 220 269 Cal. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
Mutual Pharmaceutical Co., 731 F. [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 4:16 pm
Sears, Roebuck & Co., 839 F.2d 302 (7th Cir. 1988) (holding that the EEOC failed to establish that the employer discriminated against women in hiring for commission sales positions because the court credited the employer’s “lack of interest” defense). [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 3:15 pm
Sears, Roebuck & Co., 727 F.3d 796, 799 (7th Cir.2013) (construing Comcast as holding only “that a damages suit cannot be certified to proceed as a class action unless the damages sought are the result of the class-wide injury that the suit alleges” (emphasis in original)); Leyva v. [read post]
