Search for: "Scales v. Social Security Administration" Results 281 - 300 of 318
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Dec 2017, 4:30 am by Michael Madison
I don’t assume that law schools should turn an operating profit; Ph.D programs in the humanities and the social sciences don’t turn an operating profit, either. [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 8:32 pm
The people, by throwing themselves into either scale, will infallibly make it preponderate. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am by Ben
In Europe, The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that the consent of a copyright holder does not cover the distribution of an object incorporating a work where that object has been altered after its initial marketing to such an extent that it constitutes a new reproduction of that work (Case C‑419/13, Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright) with Eleonora opining that the decision means that that there is no such thing as a general principle of… [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 3:00 am by Garrett Hinck
Supreme Court last cited one of its pieces in McDonald v. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 9:07 am by Matthew Kahn
Supreme Court last cited one of its pieces in McDonald v. [read post]
18 Mar 2023, 8:08 am by Guest Author
And no better leaders to shape these laws and policies than the thoughts leaders who have chimed in here, honing their broad expertise in work law, intellectual property law, health and biomedicine, administrative law, security law, criminal justice, financial regulation, and more. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 7:33 pm by Adam Thierer
Today I am testifying at an FCC hearing on “Serving the Public Interest in the Digital Era. [read post]
1 May 2017, 5:00 am by Mike Madison
That’s Pittsburgh.[1] On the other hand, I live conceptually in the world of disruption and innovation, and disregard for precedent, social fabrics, and community. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 10:33 am by Shannon Togawa Mercer
And thus the scales tip toward a hard Brexit. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 4:00 am by Administrator
This article critically reviews the Supreme Court of Canada’s recent decision on the application of human rights laws to law firm partners in McCormick v Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP in an effort to show how the purposive approach is invoked, how it is then either ignored or applied incorrectly, and how the purposive approach ought to have been deployed if we had remained faithful to its structure and demands. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 9:53 am
For instance, back in 1985, Robert Levinson complained of a contract with the Eckerd Foundation for the management of the Okeechobee School for Boys in which “[v]irtually every” contract item concerned input activities and pertained to administrative/operational functions. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am by Ben
But French law does provide for the Louvre's actions: last December last, France's highest administrative court, the Conseil d’État, confirmed that a public entity can forbid a private entity to take pictures of works inside a public museum. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 10:14 am by Hilde
”On September 9th last year, Stevens engaged in a classic version of advocacy-by-interrogation during the argument of Citizens United v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:20 pm by carie
”On September 9th last year, Stevens engaged in a classic version of advocacy-by-interrogation during the argument of Citizens United v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 12:29 pm by JURIST Staff
GHANA Lana Osei is a JURIST staff correspondent in Ghana and a recent graduate of the GIMPA (Ghana Institute of Management and Public Administration) Faculty of Law. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 10:26 am by Kevin LaCroix
Indeed, in McDonald’s II, the court reached back before Caremark to the 1963 Delaware Supreme Court decision in Graham v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:56 pm by Andrew F. Sellars
This continued until early January 2011, when an MIT systems administrator detected that the downloading was coming from a network closet in an MIT building and the called the police. [read post]