Search for: "Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog" Results 281 - 300 of 1,463
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Dec 2019, 8:50 am by John Jascob
Because insider trading law is largely judge made, it has at times produced confusing judicial decisions regarding the elements of the offense, a trend most recently exemplified by a series of opinions issued by the Second Circuit. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 5:40 pm by Phillips & Associates
” Since the employer was a public entity, the plaintiff filed suit for civil rights violations under 42 U.S.C. [read post]
20 Nov 2019, 2:58 pm by Phillips & Associates
The court ruled that an employer could be liable in this scenario under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 6:58 am by Jesse M. Coleman
On August 23, 2019, the United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit ruled that the Texas Citizen’s Participation Act, Texas Civil Practices and Remedies Code Chapter 27 (“TCPA”), did not apply in federal court. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 5:59 am by Jonathan Shaub
Almost every blog, newspaper and magazine has, at some point in the past year, published an “explainer” on executive privilege and its related doctrines or provided some descriptive account of the history of the doctrine. [read post]
27 Oct 2019, 7:54 am by familoo
As is increasingly often the case, Gordon Exall beat me to the writing up of this case on his excellent Civil Litigation Blog - it is a judgment containing important lessons for both family and civil practitioners - and indeed for judges in both jurisdictions. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 12:38 pm by John Elwood
The second returning case will be familiar to Supreme Court-watchers: Gundy v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 3:41 am by Scott Bomboy
Bostock sued on his own in 2016 in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia and later received professional representation, alleging a Title VII civil rights violation. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 3:36 am by SHG
In a non-precedential summary order, the Second Circuit affirms. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 3:46 pm by Glen C. Hansen
”  The Chief Justice added that the guarantee of a federal forum under the Civil Rights Act of 1871 “rings hollow for takings plaintiffs, who are forced to litigate their claims in state court. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 3:46 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
”  The Chief Justice added that the guarantee of a federal forum under the Civil Rights Act of 1871 “rings hollow for takings plaintiffs, who are forced to litigate their claims in state court. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 8:28 am by schlangerlaw
First, Midland asked the Second Circuit to reconsider its decision or hear the case en banc (i.e., in front of all thirteen active Second Circuit judges, instead of a three-judge panel). [read post]