Search for: "Smith v. Davis"
Results 281 - 300
of 763
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Sep 2015, 5:16 am
& Hosp. v. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 12:06 pm
GrahamQuartavious Davis v. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 3:03 pm
Linzey Smith and State v. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 4:09 pm
Interception and Surveillance We begin with an important series of posts about the forthcoming Investigatory Powers Bill by Graham Smith on his Cyberleagle blog. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 7:22 pm
Pediatrics 108: e59-59 Mead PM, Slutsker L, Dietz V, McCaig LF, Bresee JS, Shapiro C, Griffin PM, and Tauxe RV. (1999). [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 3:47 am
Davis v. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 2:27 pm
Lawyers for the county clerk, Kim Davis, said she would seek a stay of the decision from the Sixth Circuit (the appellate court that was overruled in Obergefell v. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 2:11 pm
Case style: Neese v. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 2:11 pm
Case style: Neese v. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 10:42 am
Crucially, the majority rejected the government’s argument that CSLI falls under the third-party doctrine of Smith v. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 7:28 am
Miller and Smith v. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 2:35 pm
See Commonwealth v. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 1:00 pm
Davis, Acting Warden of San Quentin State Prison, Nos. 09-99012, 09-99013 (Ikuta with NR Smith and Murguia) --- Finding that a reasoned opinion of the California Supreme Court regarding a California death-row prisoner's claim of penalty-phase ineffective assistance was entitled to deference under AEDPA, the panel reversed the district court's grant of relief from a death sentence. [read post]
25 Jul 2015, 8:11 pm
Cranor, Devra Lee Davis , John M. [read post]
19 Jul 2015, 4:28 pm
The two lead claimants, David Davis MP and Tom Watson MP, were represented by Liberty. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
Davis v. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 4:13 pm
Newspapers, Journalism and regulation The IPCC rejected a complaint about the harassment warning letter issued to Croydon Advertiser report Gareth Davies. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 3:27 pm
Supreme Court’s 1979 decision in Smith v. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 7:30 am
They gave three reasons for their conclusion: No misuse of power Eclairs and Glengary sought to rely on the case of Howard Smith Ltd v Ampol Petroleum Ltd [1974] AC 821 where it was held that the board had used their power for an improper purpose. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 6:08 am
Smith (7th Cir. 1978); Tollett v. [read post]
