Search for: "Smith v. Ohio" Results 281 - 300 of 948
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Mar 2007, 11:40 pm
USA    Northern District of Ohio at ClevelandJULIA SMITH GIBBONS, Circuit Judge. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 9:38 am by Jeff Gamso
  He's crazy as a bedbug, and clearly was at the time of the killings and the time of the trial.None of those things mattered because the legal standards as they've developed (in part at the Supreme Court in Smith v. [read post]
11 Nov 2007, 10:11 am
City of Columbus, 136 F.3d 1055, 1062 (6th Cir. 1998), we affirm. 07a0438p.06 Smith, et al. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 3:20 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) Michael Smith and I have just filed an amicus brief that I drafted for Arming Women Against Rape & Endangerment (AWARE) in the Michigan Second Amendment stun gun case, People v. [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 9:46 am by Cicely Wilson
Read More Court rules against counting ballots cast incorrectly in Ohio, Los Angeles Times NML Capital, Ltd. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2008, 8:37 am
Zachariah Polihonki    Western District of Michigan at Grand Rapids 08a0352p.062008/09/24 Smith v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 8:17 am by MBettman
The issue was whether and when a litigant may use a pseudonym in civil litigation—in this case, a number of intentional tort claims arising out of alleged sex abuse. 3L Chris Tieke’s post, No More Horsing Around with the Ohio Revised , argues that the Supreme Court of Ohio has set a common approach to interpreting statutorily created torts and immunities, using the case of   Smith v. [read post]
29 May 2008, 5:55 pm
Smith    Eastern District of Michigan at Flint 08a0193p.06 2008/05/22 USA v. [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 9:46 am by Cicely Wilson
Read More Court rules against counting ballots cast incorrectly in Ohio, Los Angeles Times NML Capital, Ltd. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 4:36 am
This may come as a shock to Judge Keasler who concurred in Smith v. [read post]
5 Apr 2008, 6:17 pm
For the reasons set forth below, we affirm. 08a0124p.062008/03/26 Smith v. [read post]