Search for: "Smith v. Stevens" Results 281 - 300 of 853
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Feb 2017, 4:23 am by Edith Roberts
In the Kentucky Law Journal, law student Page Smith looks at Kindred Nursing Centers Limited Partnership v. [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 9:02 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Judge Brinkema rightly rejected this argument, citing the Supreme Court’s 2005 decision in McCreary County v. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm by John Dean
Abercrombie & Fitch (2015), which increased the protection given to a Muslim wearing a head scarf; and Smith v. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 5:52 am
Smith, 451 U.S. 454, 462 (1981) (quotation and emphasis omitted). [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
In its recent post-Tincher decision in the case of High v. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 10:48 pm
Researching the answer In KCI v Smith & Nephew [2010] EWHC 1487 (Pat), Arnold J held that information that would be acquired by the skilled person as a matter of routine can, in addition to CGK, be taken into account in considering inventive step. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 1:54 pm by Giles Peaker
In Stevens & Cutting Limited v Andersen [1990] 1 EGLR 95 Stewart-Smith LJ stated the principles relevant to the doctrine of election between causes of action in the following terms: “A party may be deprived of the right to pursue a certain course of conduct if, when faced with two alternative and inconsistent courses of action, he chooses one rather than the other and his election is communicated to the other party. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 1:30 am by Blog Editorial
Today’s live blog team comprises Anthony Fairclough (Matrix), Emma Boffey, Lisa Fox, and Diane Jerry (from CMS) as well as Cathryn Hopkins, Ryan Dolby-Stevens and Tom Pritchard (all from Olswang). 16.10 Lord Neuberger thanks all the court staff and lawyers for their hard work in bringing the case. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 5:29 pm by Steven D. Schwinn
Schwinn, John Marshall Law School Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly today dismissed Smith v. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 3:44 am
 In the aftermath of Edwards v Cook, a number of patentees have successfully deployed creative arguments to avoid falling foul of an “Edwards v Cook”-style attack. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 4:53 am by Brian Cordery
At first instance, Arnold J followed two first instance English Court decisions which suggest that the transfer of equitable title is sufficient (KCI v Smith & Nephew [2010] and HTC v Gemalto [2013]). [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 3:49 am by Edith Roberts
Turkmen and Hasty v. [read post]
2 Oct 2016, 9:01 pm by Joseph Margulies
Along with Michael Ratner and Steven Watt at the Center for Constitutional Rights, Clive was my co-counsel in Rasul v. [read post]