Search for: "Starkes v. Marks"
Results 281 - 300
of 323
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2007, 4:01 pm
In a 1984 case, North Carolina v. [read post]
26 Dec 2012, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Sackett v. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 2:01 pm
Special Counsel Jack Smith has concluded that he can prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that several private lawyers acted as co-conspirators in former President Donald Trump’s criminal effort to overturn the legitimate results of the 2020 presidential election. [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 5:33 pm
Haack’s question mark is telling. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 2:58 pm
The Supreme Court will consider the constitutionality of HB20 in NetChoice, LLC v. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 6:00 am
In R v Marcott, Justices Arbour and Osler concurred that an element of the offense was “that deception is practiced…and that the person undertaking to tell fortunes represents that he has the power to do so with the intention that such representation should be believed”, and “[where an] assertion, or undertaking [to predict the future] is made for reward…with intent to deceive, the offense is complete. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 12:00 am
Supreme Court in the affirmative action case of United Steelworkers of America v. [read post]
11 Mar 2017, 7:01 am
Supreme Court in EEOC v. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 4:45 am
Wanda Vázquez Garced was arrested yesterday on bribery charges, the Justice Department has said. [read post]
20 Oct 2022, 4:42 am
The department has previously made clear that it believes Trump failed to comply with a May subpoena ordering the return of all documents marked as classified and that more government records remain missing. [read post]
10 Feb 2016, 9:01 pm
Rubio has said that he would appoint Supreme Court justices who would overturn Obergefell v. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 9:58 pm
That’s a stark difference in pay. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 10:01 pm
New Jersey: New Jersey Law Blog by Stark & Stark New Jerse [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 10:51 am
Odders-White & Mark J. [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 4:00 am
” JUSTICE BREYER’s assertion that “copyright statutes must serve public, not private, ends,” similarly misses the mark. [read post]
5 Mar 2025, 10:37 am
FCC and Fox Television Stations v. [read post]
7 Aug 2024, 5:38 pm
At the heart of this jurisdictional puzzle lies a stark truth: the Israel-Palestine conflict does not abide by the modern framework of the law of occupation, under which Israel is a sovereign territory that is separate from the Occupied Palestinian Territories of the Gaza Strip and the West Bank. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 4:22 am
Mark A. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 7:13 am
The Bradford Hill Predicate: Ruling Out Random and Systematic Error In two recent posts, I spent some time discussing a recent law review, which had some important things to say about specific causation.[1] One of several points from which I dissented was the article’s argument that Sir Austin Bradford Hill had not made explicit that ruling out random and systematic error was required before assessing his nine “viewpoints” on whether an association was causal. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 11:06 am
"; Mark Toufayan, University of Ottawa-Canada, "The Politics of Representing International Lawyers’ Contribution to the Trade-Development Nexus in Africa"; and Adrian Di Giovanni, International Development Research Centre-Ottawa, Canada, "Understanding the Uses of 'Do No Harm' in International Assistance. [read post]
