Search for: "State Ex Rel. Head v. Head"
Results 281 - 300
of 369
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Sep 2011, 8:41 am
Even so, the ruling in Ingraham v. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 4:07 am
Walsh, et al.; SEC v. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 8:56 am
The September 2011 edition of InsideCounsel magazine highlights the significance of the First Circuit's decision in United States ex rel. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 7:42 am
(Alan S. v. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 7:30 am
") Remember Ricci v. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 4:30 am
But it does remind me of the seminal case, United States ex rel. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 7:34 am
This was nearly the case in State ex rel. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 1:29 am
GE Healthcare, Ltd., et. al (Docket Report) District Court N D Texas: Judge Solis compares false marking to ‘someone who says, ‘I am not married,’ when indeed, they are’: United States of America, ex rel. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 8:56 pm
Is law school really just a big head game? [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 2:40 pm
Fitzgerald and State ex rel. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 2:40 pm
Fitzgerald and State ex rel. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 7:15 pm
At this assertion, Judge Sims asked whether any case law stating just that. [read post]
16 May 2011, 11:52 am
The facts The facts of the case were relatively straightforward. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 8:03 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 4:59 am
– FCAFC decision in Blackmagic Design Pty Ltd v Overliese (IP Whiteboard) Caribbean Carribean IP: Establishing an arbitral tribunal for the region (IP Watch) Canada Petition launched in opposition to CETA (Michael Geist) Clerical error in the Intellectual Property Office: Repligen Corp. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 4:05 pm
Comment Interim libel injunctions are relatively rare but can be granted if “it is clear that no defence will succeed at the trial”(Greene v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2005] QB 972 per Brooke LJ at [57]). [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 2:14 am
In particular the texts of the Trade Mark Directive and the Community Trade Mark Regulation should be rewritten to match what the Court of Justice said they actually meant in eg Case C-292/00 Davidoff v Gofkid [we've all got used to the law now, so it would be a shame to spoil things by changing it -- but hasn't the ECJ's ruling in Davidoff done quite a bit to clutter the register by extending trade mark protection way past that which the law explicitly provided?] [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 6:14 am
View the Head Order in “Virginia State Bar EX REL, Second District Committee v. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 9:08 pm
You must meet the examiner head on, and show the substantive difference. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 6:40 am
(Eugene Volokh) In State ex rel. [read post]
