Search for: "State v. Alexander" Results 281 - 300 of 2,323
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Case date: 20 April 2022 Case number: No. 18-916 Court: Supreme Court of the United States A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
31 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm by Geeyoung Min and Alexander M. Krischik
This post comes to us from Professor Geeyoung Min at Michigan State University College of Law and Alexander M. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 6:15 am by Tess Graham
Under Secretary of State Nuland on Accelerating Aid to Ukraine and Sanctions Against Russiaby Viola Gienger (@ViolaGienger) (March 9, 2022) Humanitarian Corridors in Ukraine: Impasse, Ploy or Narrow Passage of Hope? [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 4:42 am by Emma Snell
The office of Inspector General Joseph V. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 8:20 am by Brian Cordery (Bristows)
The law in this regard was summarised by Arnold J in Jarden Consumer Solutions (Europe) Ltd v SEB SA [2014] EWHC 445 (Pat) at [103]: “[103] As Kitchin LJ and Sir Robin Jacob said in their joint judgment in Gedeon  Richter plc v Bayer Pharma AG[2012] EWCA Civ 235, [2013] Bus LR D17 at [61], ‘it is trite law that… the older (from the priority date of a patent under attack) a piece of prior art said to render a patent obvious, the harder it is to show… [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 4:40 am by Emma Snell
Alexander Ward and Betsy Woodruff Swan report for POLITICO. [read post]
., vacated its prior decision, and reversed the district court’s judgment that the claims of patent at issue were not invalid (Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2022, 9:13 am by Josh Blackman
S. ___, ___ (2019) (lead opinion) (slip op., at 14) (The Supremacy Clause cannot "be deployed" "to elevate abstract and unenacted legislative desires above state law"); Alexander v. [read post]
10 Jul 2022, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  Bickel trusted the Court to discern our deepest “fundamental values,” such as a commitment to racial justice that required the invalidation of segregation in Brown v. [read post]
Beginning in the 1980s but picking up speed in 2011 in a case called AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 2:56 pm by INFORRM
The High Court has ruled that security and intelligence services must obtain “prior independent authorisation” to access individuals’ communication data from telecommunications companies (Liberty v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2022] EWHC 1630 (Admin)). [read post]