Search for: "State v. Cummings"
Results 281 - 300
of 583
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jun 2015, 9:29 am
” Seasoned attorneys—or those who were practicing law before the United States Supreme Court’s 1977 decision in Bates v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 3:31 pm
City of Cumming, 212 F.3d 1332, 1333 (11th Cir. 2000) (recognizing a First Amendment right to photograph or videotape police conduct); Fordyce v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 11:14 am
Kohr’s lawsuit sparked comparison to the famous 1994 Liebeck v. [read post]
8 May 2015, 7:56 am
The exceedingly long decision of the court in Grocery Manufacturers Assoc. v. [read post]
5 May 2015, 11:41 am
Arnold is admitted to practice in all state courts in North Carolina, in the United States Federal Court for the Western District of North Carolina, in the North Carolina Court of Appeals and Supreme Court, and in the Fourth Circuit United States Court of Appeals in Richmond, Virginia. [read post]
18 Apr 2015, 1:55 pm
., Plaintiff, v. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 11:15 am
., Plaintiff, v. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 12:40 am
However if the hashtag cum slogan contains only common words, nevertheless it is registered based on secondary meaning, the trade mark holder will paradoxically perhaps have an easier time of enforcing its mark against third parties because of the lack of any other basis for asserting functionality in the mark. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 7:07 am
North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 5:30 pm
Vaudreuil of Liebert Cassidy Whitmore on the firm’s California Public Agency Labor & Employment Blog Lesser Known Exemptions: The “Ministerial” Exception to the FLSA - Chicago lawyer Doug Hass of Franczek Radelet on his blog, Wage & Hour Insights Startups and Small Businesses: Picking your Business Team – Pennsylvania attorney Matthew Landis of Russell, Krafft & Gruber on the firm’s Lancaster Law Blog Alabama Seeks To Become 48th State To Enact… [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 6:23 am
Arnold is admitted to practice in all state courts in North Carolina, in the United States Federal Court for the Western District of North Carolina, in the North Carolina Court of Appeals and Supreme Court, and in the Fourth Circuit United States Court of Appeals in Richmond, Virginia. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 4:43 pm
Opening with a clip of the band the Blue Notes performing in the 1970s, Davis and Soocher introduced the case of Cummings v. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 11:45 am
The United States Supreme Court actually rejected the notion that the Federal Government can require an individual to purchase health insurance in a now-famous 2012 decision authored by Chief Justice John Roberts in National Federation of Independent Business et al. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 3:32 pm
From questioning today in King v. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 2:29 am
Supreme Court will hear oral argument March 23 in the case of Walker v. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 12:23 pm
In the Virginia case—titled Landini v. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 9:28 am
E.g., YOU CUM LIKE A GIRL. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 7:43 am
However, the federal district court in Ohio dismissed her claims of failure to promote in violation of public policy and intentional infliction of emotional distress (Cummings v. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 1:44 pm
” Frye v. [read post]
24 Jan 2015, 5:31 am
Cummings, 38 C.M.R. 174, 177 (C.M.A. 1968); and United States v. [read post]
