Search for: "State v. Gary S." Results 281 - 300 of 1,702
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Dec 2016, 4:38 am by Edith Roberts
At Casetext, David Boyle considers how the court’s 2015 opinion in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 4:59 am
Revisiting the SEC’s Proxy Advisor Rule Posted by Paul Rose and Christopher J. [read post]
24 Nov 2006, 2:41 pm
Kobylarz discusses Mark Lemley's change in position on obviousness in KSR v. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
  Rodger Citron reviews Gary Stein's in Justice for Sale: Graft, Greed, and a Crooked Federal Judge in 1930s Gotham (Verdict). [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 4:00 pm
Here's a quick guide to all of our posts analyzing the Court's decisions in Mass v. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 3:26 pm by Ashby Jones
After all, part of her job as Secretary of State is to explain and defend the states election laws to a variety of candidates. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 1:52 am
  SCOTUSblog reports that "no action was taken on a plea by the state of Louisiana to reconsider the June 25 decision in Kennedy v. [read post]
27 Apr 2019, 5:50 am by Patricia Salkin
In this case, the Oregon Shores Conservation Coalition (“OSCC”) and the State of Oregon appealed a judgment entered in a writ-of review proceeding that affirmed Clatsop County’s determination that Gary and Beverly Aspmo had a vested right under Measure 49 to complete a 15-lot subdivision on their property. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 10:29 am by Rick Pildes
As I've noted here before, in early December the Supreme Court is going to engage one of the most important cases of the Term, Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 10:57 am by Steve Davies
ANALYSIS The cornerstones of plaintiffs’ separation of powers challenge were laid in the mid-19th century when the Supreme Court decided United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 4:59 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Thus, as plaintiffs facts alleging extortion do not state a claim, so too are plaintiff’s claims that the Schutzer defendants submitted a forged document insufficient to state a claim. [read post]