Search for: "State v. Jan G." Results 281 - 300 of 584
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jun 2020, 10:35 am by Schachtman
Federal and State Prosecutions against Physicians and Screening Companies After Judge Jack’s exposé of fraudulent and false diagnoses in the silicosis MDL, various news media reported that the United States Attorney’s office in the Southern District of New York was investigating possible criminal charges against the physicians and lawyers who orchestrated the screenings. [read post]
[v] Iowa law also prohibits local governments, such as cities and counties, from setting minimum wages higher than the state rate. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 7:13 am by Beth Graham
Jan. 31, 2011), and its implications on the pending Second and Fifth Circuit appeals in  Scandinavian Reinsurance Co. v. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 3:48 pm by Katie Calogero and Daniel Alvarado
United States, the Court found the terms of the solicitation violated the SBA regulations regarding the evaluation of mentor-protégé offerors.[6] Specifically, the SBA regulations regarding mentor-protégé offerors states, “A procuring activity may not require the protégé firm to individually meet the same evaluation or responsibility criteria as that required of other offerors generally. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 7:17 pm by Kelly
: The Field v Google; Righthaven v Jan Klerks (PlagiarismToday) Radio, RIAA: mandatory FM radio in cell phones is the future (ArsTechnica) (ArsTechnica) (Public Knowledge) (1709 Blog) (ArsTechnica) Breaking down the DMCA exemptions, Pt. 2: Free your phone and the rest will follow? [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 3:12 pm by James R. Marsh
Courts have similarly determined that an offender’s possession of child abuse images causes harm to the depicted children.The United States Supreme Court first acknowledged such harm in 1982 in New York v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 9:14 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
Moreover, “[g]rounds of error not asserted by points of error are considered waived on appeal. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 5:00 am by Josh Blackman
ABA Model Rule 8.4(g) in the States, 68 Catholic University Law Review 629 (2020). [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 2:11 am by Peter Mahler
Based on those unanimous rulings, the court in Farro v Schochet, __ AD3d __, 2021 NY Slip Op 00150 [2d Dept Jan. 13, 2021], granted my clients’ request to dismiss an action brought against them by a cashed-out minority member who sought to rescind the merger on grounds of alleged fraud and breach of fiduciary, and who also argued for rescission on the ground that he was not permitted to vote on the merger at a meeting of the members called on 20-days notice. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 1:27 am by Kevin LaCroix
In an interesting opinion that includes among other things a noteworthy discussion of issues arising under the Morrison v. [read post]