Search for: "State v. Miner" Results 281 - 300 of 1,488
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Aug 2020, 4:58 am by Schachtman
Schepers, “The Biological Action of Talc and Other Silicate Minerals,” in Goodwin, Proceedings on the Symposium on Talc; U.S. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 8:03 am by Schachtman
The subject of Schepers’ letter was “Scientific Data on Fibrous Minerals and Beryllium. [read post]
The State Water Resources Control Board Releases Proposed Rule Modifying The General Permit For Suction Dredge Miners. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 11:17 pm by Schachtman
” In a chart entitled “Mineral Dusts,” the 1956 regulations specifically imposed a maximum exposure for free crystalline silica, depending upon the percentage concentration of silica in the total dust. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 9:44 am by Schachtman
”), aff’d sub nom., Juni v. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 6:19 am by Schachtman
According to the Mineralogical Society of America’s Handbook of Mineralogy (and every other standard work on mineralogy I reviewed), anthophyllite and talc, whether in fibrous habit or not, are two different minerals, with very different chemical formulae, crystal chemistry, and structure.[20] Anthophyllite has the chemical formula: (Mg;Fe2+)2(Mg;Fe2+)5Si8O22(OH)2 and is an amphibole double chain silicate. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 6:45 am by Josh Blackman
On Monday, the Supreme Court decided a fun case with a funny title: United States Forest Service v. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 9:00 am
Reversing the Fourth Circuit, the Supreme Court on Monday issued its opinion in United States Forest Service v. [read post]