Search for: "State v. Save"
Results 281 - 300
of 11,687
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2012, 4:09 am
On this all agree The Anti Injunction Act Does not bar challenge Commerce Clause can’t save Individual mandate But Taxing Clause does Medicaid changes States can’t lose existing funds New programs opt-out Opinion: pdf html [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 6:46 am
In support of this, he cited the view of Mr Justice Colman in Navigas v Enron. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 6:41 am
Justice Gogoi, upholding the principal laid down in William Staney v State of Madhya Pradesh (SC 1956, AIR 116), also took into consideration that the victim did not die on the spot or very shortly after the infliction of injuries but survived for some days in the hospital before death.On a literal interpretation, the judgment seems in consonance with S 300(a) and (b) of the Indian Penal Code. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 6:41 am
Justice Gogoi, upholding the principal laid down in William Staney v State of Madhya Pradesh (SC 1956, AIR 116), also took into consideration that the victim did not die on the spot or very shortly after the infliction of injuries but survived for some days in the hospital before death.On a literal interpretation, the judgment seems in consonance with S 300(a) and (b) of the Indian Penal Code. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 4:48 am
Share/Save [read post]
16 Aug 2022, 2:04 pm
Wade (“Roe”) from 1973 and noted the recent Dobbs, State Health Officer of The Mississippi Department of Health, et al. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 9:31 am
Given that the state has expressly asked the Court to overturn its landmark decisions in Roe v. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 1:15 pm
New England, 546 U.S. 320, 329 (2006); see also United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 1:23 pm
In Pearson Education v. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 6:26 am
“How can they fine this man when he probably saved lives? [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 2:37 pm
United States v. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 9:45 am
Ruling on an issue of first impression for the state’s high court on Friday in Commonwealth v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 12:17 am
Yesterday, we posted most of the amici briefs in Sackett v. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 4:01 pm
AOL’” by Hillary Brill “How the Scam Artists at Stratton Oakmont Made ‘Zeran’ Possible and Unwittingly Saved the Internet” by Robert J. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 1:27 pm
On this note, the court stated that “perfection is certainly not the standard required of legal advice in this context. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 7:54 am
It can be a great cost-saving tool. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 2:40 am
Masri v Consolidated Contractors International Co SAL and another (No 2) [2011] EWCA Civ 21; [2011] WLR (D) 11 “Save in exceptional circumstances, para 4.2 of the Practice Direction supporting CPR Pt 32 required the deponent of an affidavit to identify the source of the relevant information or belief stated in the affidavit. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 2:48 pm
BY MARK JOSEPH STERN The Supreme Court’s 5–4 decision in Allen v. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 2:43 am
Baker v. [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 4:10 am
In Schwartz v. [read post]
