Search for: "State v. Singh " Results 281 - 300 of 619
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Nov 2017, 5:45 am by Barry Sookman
 The CDA also expressly states that “Nothing in this section shall be construed to limit or expand any law pertaining to intellectual property” and that “Nothing in this section shall be construed to prevent any State from enforcing any State law that is consistent with this section. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 9:04 am
| Beware of your old expert reports, as Henry Carr J allows hearsay expert evidence in Illumina v Ariosa | Still want to be a UPC judge? [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 10:00 pm by Tom Goldstein
[Disclosure:  Tejinder Singh of the law firm Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys work for or contribute to this blog in various capacities, was among the counsel on an ;amicus brief filed by international human rights advocates in support of the respondents in this case.] [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 12:21 pm
Khela stems from a stabbing incident at a B.C. prison. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 2:03 pm by Carl Shusterman
Garland (5-24-23) Matter of Fernandes – BIA (4-2-22) Deciphering Matter of Fernandes (12-5-22) Singh v. [read post]
3 Jun 2007, 8:53 am
 - Sachin Pilot, Gujjar leaders meet Rajnath Singh - Gujjars call for a Delhi bandh on Monday     [read post]
15 May 2017, 3:32 am by Peter Mahler
In Lewis v Alcobi, 2017 NY Slip Op 30664(U) [Sup Ct NY County Apr. 6, 2017], Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Anil C. [read post]
15 May 2017, 3:32 am by Peter Mahler
In Lewis v Alcobi, 2017 NY Slip Op 30664(U) [Sup Ct NY County Apr. 6, 2017], Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Anil C. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 9:23 am by Shamnad Basheer
Pranesh further criticized the decision of Justice Manmohan Singh of the Delhi High Court in John Wiley v. [read post]
” Similarly, in 2018, the Supreme Court ruled that individuals have a right to a union of companionship under the constitution but not the union of marriage (Navtej Singh Johar v. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 2:22 pm by The Legal Blog
The Supreme Court in State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. [read post]
3 May 2018, 3:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
However, the Court of Appeals instructs that FOIL is to be "liberally construed and its exemptions narrowly interpreted so that the public is granted maximum access to the records of government" (Matter of Town of Waterford v New York State Dept. of Envtl. [read post]