Search for: "State v. Superior Court" Results 281 - 300 of 11,180
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jun 2016, 12:22 pm
 Even though the trial court had enjoined it under the new provisions of Section 9002 of the Elections Code.It was an important enough case that it went straight from the trial court to the California Supreme Court. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 7:57 pm by Staff
(Maricopa County Superior Court No. 2003-014271CR): Mr. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 1:42 pm by Jamison Koehler
Superior Court judges do not typically allow re-cross examinations. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 6:01 pm by Robin Mashal
Huang Cho Hong, et al., in the Superior Court of State of California, County of Los Angeles, Central Judicial District, Case no. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 1:35 pm
 And that decision's from no schlub of a court:  it's from the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 2:14 pm
 Plaintiff files a state court lawsuit through counsel, plaintiff and his attorney decide to file two other duplicative actions in federal court as well "to be safe", and then plaintiff and his attorney decide to dismiss the state suit and one of the federal actions and go forward with the third, and attorney does so. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 1:55 pm
 Indeed, as Justice Bamattre-Manoukian's opinion itself notes, the New York state courts have done precisely that. [read post]
1 Mar 2022, 4:06 pm by Dan Miller
Fulton County Superior Court ***EFILED***QW Date: 1/25/2022 1:53 PM Cathelene Robinson, Clerk IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF FULTON COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA Continue reading › [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 7:54 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here are the materials in Lac Courte Oreilles Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians v. [read post]
16 May 2024, 3:14 pm
In state court, if you're assigned an "all-purpose" judge, you generally have to "paper" them (CCP 170.6) within 10 days. [read post]
5 Jul 2009, 9:41 pm
State, a unanimous Indiana Supreme Court held that a search warrant issued by the Madison Superior Court for Jackson’s home was valid under the good faith exemption to the warrant requirement. [read post]