Search for: "State v. Sutton"
Results 281 - 300
of 600
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Nov 2015, 3:30 pm
Micjo, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2015, 8:31 am
Stachon v. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 5:00 am
TD Ameritrade, Inc., October 8, 2015, Sutton, J.). [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 1:20 pm
” In United States v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 4:29 am
Prudential–Bache Sec., Inc., 821 F.2d 581, 586 (11th Cir.1984); Sutton v. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 12:48 pm
Last month, in Garcia v. [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 6:22 am
Sutton v. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 5:54 am
Beginning with Sutton v. [read post]
12 Jul 2015, 2:23 pm
In United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 5:01 pm
Putting to one side that Judge Sutton and the Sixth Circuit created an embarrassing conflict in the circuits that was otherwise not present, I emphasized to my class the key fact that public opinion had moved so fast on the issue, that many more Americans today support the right to same-sex marriage than supported inter-racial marriage at the time of Loving v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:29 pm
Texas and United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 12:17 pm
In his opinion for 6th Circuit Court of Appeals, last November, upholding the constitutionality of state non-recognition of same-sex marriage and provoking the Supreme Court to take up the issue, Judge Jeffrey Sutton asserted that, “If it is constitutionally irrational to stand by the man-woman definition of marriage, it must be constitutionally irrational to stand by the monogamous definition of marriage. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 8:16 pm
Harkening to doubts expressed by Judge Sutton in his United States v. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 2:42 pm
Two interesting amicus briefs in Obergefell v. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 6:43 am
United States Congress, 2015 U.S. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 7:13 am
State v. [read post]
17 Jan 2015, 8:52 am
Following Judge Sutton, the states will argue that the issue of marriage equality ought to be worked out state by state. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 3:12 pm
Feeney, and Romer v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 12:31 pm
Another good reason to review Judge Sutton’s opinion is how he aptly addresses both Loving v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 12:17 pm
“The state of mind of the accused infringer is notrelevant to this objective inquiry. [read post]
