Search for: "State v. Tennis"
Results 281 - 300
of 319
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Mar 2010, 4:12 pm
"Rehnquist: A Personal Portrait of the Distinguished Chief Justice of the United States. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 4:01 am
Industries brought an action before the Court of First Instance, which held that the Board of Appeal had wrongly stated that the marks at issue were clearly distinct. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 10:14 am
In that spirit, Roberts last week denounced President Obama’s criticism of the Court in his State of the Union address, saying that the occasion had “degenerated to a political pep rally. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 9:17 am
In the case of Qualitex Co. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 10:32 am
Pursuant to In re Merrick V., 122 Cal.App.4th 235 (2004), the court stated that ". . .leaving a 12 year old home alone posed a substantial risk of harm. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 6:58 am
In Lancôme v. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 8:44 pm
In today’s case (Sauer v. [read post]
23 Aug 2009, 4:29 am
Marcinkowska v. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 1:58 pm
In this case, the hybrid tennis court was not “used” in the United States - it was “used” in Spain and that use was broadcast in the United States.You can watch some of the match here:Decision affirmedMarcinkowska v. [read post]
15 May 2009, 9:56 pm
Kasic stated, "I like to work hard to make more money for my family. [read post]
1 May 2009, 11:36 am
Cir. 2007), The All England Lawn Tennis Club (Wimbledon) Limited v. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 1:02 am
The Court granted the media request seeking same-day access to the audio of arguments in Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District Number One v. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
(Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) (Patent Prospector) (Patent Docs) (Patent Baristas) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Law360) (BLOG@IP::JUR) (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) (Patently-O) (Inventive Step) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Techdirt) (Hal Wegner) Reactions to Patent Reform Bill 2009 (IP Watchdog) (Patent Baristas) (IP Watchdog) (IP Watchdog) (Patently-O) Global Global - General World IP Day, 26 April, approaching (IPKat) … [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 4:01 pm
United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 2:02 am
Corp. v. [read post]
31 Dec 2008, 12:26 am
See United States v. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 6:15 am
The zone also required specific recreational facilities and provided details on the size of the required facilities down to the minimum number of tennis and shuffleboard courts. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 6:15 am
The zone also required specific recreational facilities and provided details on the size of the required facilities down to the minimum number of tennis and shuffleboard courts. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 7:43 pm
State v. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 7:16 pm
Guida, No. 05-6105 In death penalty habeas proceedings in a case in which petitioner effectuated a murder-for-hire against her husband, denial of habeas relief is affirmed where: 1) state courts reasonably applied Strickland by concluding that petitioner sabotaged her own defense, as counsel's performance is not deficient when counsel follows a client's instructions; 2) state courts reasonably applied Brady because even if certain letters were favorable evidence, and were… [read post]
