Search for: "State v. Tri-State Pharmaceutical"
Results 281 - 300
of 455
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Feb 2012, 9:05 am
Amylin Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 2011 U.S. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 11:15 am
Putting aside our dislike of the fact that Pennsylvania law even allows a negligent design claim in a prescription pharmaceutical case (see prior comments on Lance v. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 7:30 pm
In Fredericks v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 7:58 am
Grinage v. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 10:20 am
AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP, 634 F.3d 1352 (11th Cir. 2011). [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 9:56 am
Medtronic, Inc., 552 U.S. 312 (2008) and “impliedly preempted” — “implied preemption” is a code-phrase conservative judicial activists use when they want to pretend Congress tried to stop state tort lawsuits even when it didn’t — under § 337a of the MDA as interpreted by Buckman v. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 12:37 pm
In Polk v. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 8:02 pm
Sorrell v. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 8:01 pm
Sorrell v. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 11:22 am
Co. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 6:21 pm
Supreme Court entertained oral argument today in Mayo Collaborative Services v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 7:52 am
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp., 247 P.3d 244 (Mont. 2010). [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 4:58 am
Consider those 2,200+ Reglan cases in Philadelphia: back in July, the Supreme Court’s decision in Pliva, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 1:31 pm
§102(a).[24] As an illustration of how this might represent a change, lets look at the facts in Motionless Keyboard Co. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 12:08 pm
But, from a legal standpoint, the presence of medical device sales reps in the OR raises issues of proximity and temporality that are not typical in a pharmaceutical case (although there have been cases in which plaintiffs have tried to argue that a pharmaceutical representative should be held to an affirmative duty to take action. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 11:58 am
That abuse was at the heart of the case Kelo v. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 4:06 am
Gaudio v. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 12:00 pm
See Tang, slip op. at 7-9.Still, some enterprising lawyers tried to make that litigation the latest Chinese export to the United States. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 2:21 pm
FCC, 512 U.S. 622, (1994); United States v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 1:15 pm
I have posted before about the curious saga of two university professors of economics who curiously tried to befriend the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
