Search for: "State v. Word" Results 281 - 300 of 40,435
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Nov 2017, 2:31 am by INFORRM
The decision in Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2017] EWHC 2619 (QB) clarifies the application of the statutory defence of honest opinion under section 3 of the Defamation Act 2013. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 4:10 am by Raj Desai, Matrix
This ground was rejected on the basis that the Secretary of State retained the last word in the case of each application by virtue of residual general grounds of refusal under the Immigration Rules, which operated notwithstanding accrual of sufficient points by virtue of the issue of a CAS. [read post]
16 May 2011, 7:32 am
Concepcion states the current interpretation of the law, it may not be the final word on this topic. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 8:50 pm by Peter Vodola
   Another example of a court order that first approved a transfer of structured settlement payment rights, and later was declared ineffective, comes from the opinion of the United States District Court in Maryland, in a case captioned Rapid Settlements, Ltd. v. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 6:35 am
Back on August 19th, I posted about the Baldwin v. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 8:07 am by Chepenik Trushin LLP
  In other words, FEFJA allows a judgment from any other US state or the US federal government to be recognized and enforced as if it were a Florida judgment. [read post]
31 Jan 2008, 2:03 am
According to the Washington Post, the disturbing case of United States v. [read post]
5 May 2007, 9:32 pm by Denese Dominguez
Advisement 3, as altered by the words "at some time," was not inconsistent with the rights communicated in Advisement 2. [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 12:00 am
That the United States Supreme Court decided to hear the case of King v. [read post]
12 Jan 2007, 6:20 pm
Integra, September 25, 2005, available athttp://madisonian.net/archives/2005/06/14/merck-v-integra/ (last visited Nov. 8, 2005) ("Although a strict constructionist, Justice Scalia did not analyze the word "solely" in 271(e)(1). [read post]